Page 62 - Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications
P. 62

40                 Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications


          Table 2.5 Thermal conductivity result of nanocomposites
          and laminates [28]

          CNT in PA6               0 wt%    0.5 wt%   1 wt%    2 wt%   4 wt%
          Conductivity (W/m K) of  0.10     0.15      0.19     0.22    0.28
          nanocomposites
          Increase (%)             0        50        90       120     180
          Conductivity (W/m K) of  0.041    0.048     0.049    0.053   0.058
          laminates
          Increase (%)             0        17        20       28      42

          Note: The weight percentage in laminate is actually half of that in PA6.

            Iqbal et al. [29] have investigated the influence of nanoclay on the impact damage
         resistance of carbon fiber-epoxy composites using the low-velocity impact and Com-
         pression After Impact (CAI) tests. The results reveale that, the CFRPs containing
         organoclay have brought about significant improvement in the impact damage resis-
         tance and damage tolerance in the form of smaller damage area, higher residual
         strength, and higher threshold energy level. The total damage area is measured from
         the C-scan images, which is plotted as a function of impact energy as shown in
         Fig. 2.13. The CAI strengths are plotted as a function of impact energy as shown
         in Fig. 2.14. Incorporation of nanoclay up to 3 wt% in the matrix has lowered the
         impact damage size, when it is compared with neat epoxy laminates. It is noticed that,
         up to 3 wt% of nanoclay in the matrix, both the damage resistance and damage toler-
         ance of the laminate were improved in terms of higher threshold impact energy and
         incipient impact energy.


                        600
                        550           0% Clay
                        500           3% Clay
                      Damage area (mm 2 )  400
                        450
                                      5% Clay

                        350
                        300
                        250
                        200
                        150
                            14  16  18  20  22  24  26  28  30  32
                                        Impact energy (J)
         Fig. 2.13 Damage area as function of impact energy of composite laminates [29].
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67