Page 267 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 267

242

            requires the definition of a limit state function G(x)  through a user-defined  subroutine, ULIMIT. The
            ULTSTR deterministic solver is integrated  in ULIMIT  using  a system  call to execute the  ULTSTR
            response  analysis  module.  While  PULSTR  provides  fourteen  (14) analytical  statistical  modes  in  its
            probability distribution  library, an arbitrary user-defined probability distribution can be specified with
            the use of user-defined subroutine, UCPDF.

            EXAMPLE APPLICATIONS OF PULSTR
            In order to perform reliability assessment of a hull girder under random longitudinal bending, a limit
            state function G(x)  has to be defined with the user-defined subroutine, ULIMIT. For a given vector of
            random  variables x(z1,  22,  z3,  ..., z,,  MSW, Mw~) characterizing  randomness in hull  geometry, panel
            thickness,  stiffener parameters,  hard corner parameters,  material parameters,  and loading  parameters
            (Msw, MwD), the limit state function can be expressed as
                (3x1 = M,,,, (2, z2r”‘r  2,)  -Ma,,  (MSW M,,)             (3)
                                           3
                          2
            where Mul, is the ultimate resisting moment of a hull section computed by ULTSTR, and Mapp is the
            resultant applied bending moment induced by the stillwater bending moment (Msw) and the combined
            wave-induced and dynamic bending moment (MwD). Since the probability of failure of a hull girder is
            in the range of IO”  to   the computational effort associated with a direct application of Monte Carlo
            simulation  (MCS)  will  be  prohibitively  large, thus  precluding  its  use  for  reliability  assessment  of
            surface  ships.  While  the  first  order  reliability  method  (FORM)  provides  an  alternative  way  for
            evaluating  the  small  probability  of failure,  the  direct  application  of  Eq.  (3)  in  PULSTR’s  FORM
            solution module will result in a divergent solution because of 1) the oscillation of G(x)  near the design
            point (x”); and 2) nonlinear dependence of the hull capacity Mutt on hull parameters zi (i=l, 2,  ..., n).
            To circumvent  this  difficulty,  a  hybrid  approach  is  developed  where  a  relatively  small  number  of
            MCSs is performed to generate the statistical distribution of Muif and the PULSTR’s FORM solution
            module is applied next by replacing A4,,/f(z1, 22, ..., zn) in Eq. (3) with one independent random variable




                       = 7 00E-10  1
                       -
                       .-
                       0
                       CI         MaPP
                       2  6.00E-10
                       -
                       3
                       LL
                       > 5.00E-10
                       .-
                       cn
                       5  4.00E-10
                       n
                       -
                       .- 3 3.00E-10
                       .-
                       Q
                       2  2.00E-10
                       0
                       L
                       5 1.00E-10
                       LL
                       O            ~-
                       n O.OOE+OO
                              O.OE+OO  5.OE+09  I.OE+IO  1.5E+10  2.OE+10  2.5E+10
                                            M - Moment (Ib in)
               Figure 5: Comparison of PDF of Mapp with PDFs of Mu/, of Single and Double Hulls of Ship A
            Mu/,. The resulting significant reduction of the total number of random variables will make the FORM
            approach  computationally  efficient  and  numerically  robust  for  computing the  small  probability  of
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272