Page 306 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 306

28 1

                               reference point                   reference point










                                                                       main  ontoo on
                                                     part                part
                         initial design            z
                                                          Optimized design
                d.,  averaged downtime Pd = 64%
                                                   k, averaged downtime Pd = 27%
             free variables
                                                                      I   all   I
                                                                       designs
             pontoon breadthlheight ratio B~/T,    displacement  V    50.000m'
             pontoon centre line draught dp
             VCBIL of column from waterline &<     pontoon length
             pontoon centre line shift A+
          Figure 5.  Geometric properties of initial design and the semisubmersible optimized with respect
          to downtime due to excessive accelerations at the reference point.
                                                                     _._..
       A,,  /A',,,   ratio of cross section areas of pontoon main part  A,,  and central part  A, ,
       B, / T,   ratio of width  B,  and height  T,,  of pontoon cross section (all parts),
       d,       draught of pontoon centreline (all parts),
       4,'      normalized vertical centre of buoyancy of column  4,'  = VCB / L, , measured from
                 waterline.
       AYP      shift of pontoon centreline with respect to column centreline in direction of y-axis;
                breadth is increased when  Ay,  is positive.

       Fig.  5  presents  the  main  geometric  properties  of  initial  and  optimized  semisubmersible  design,
       respectively. The increase in pontoon centreline draught  d,  decreases heave exciting forces. This ect
       is amplified by  shifting displacement  from the  central  pontoon  part  to  the pontoon  main  part,  i.e.,
       A,,,,, /A,,,  is  increased,  and  the  outward  shift  of  the  pontoon  centreline  by  Ayp =1:86m.  Due  to  a
       decrease of  4,'  a pronounced  shoulder in the profile of the column is developed. Heave added mass
       and  damping  of  the  new  configuration  are  adopted  by  reducing  the  B,, /T,, -ratio.  The  expected
       downtime  Pd  is decreased considerably for all wave directions. The optimisation process extends the
       region of feasible sea states especially where high probabilities of occurrence are present (Fig. 6).

       The decrease in acceleration levels is reflected by a significant improvement of motion behaviour. Fig.
       7 shows the response amplitude operators of surge ( s, ),  heave (s?), roll (s,  ) and pitch ( s5  ) motion.
       The wave  heading  is  120 deg, which  corresponds  to the  most probable  direction  of  sea  states (B
       =240deg). In all cases and all ranges of wave frequencies lower motion amplitudes are achieved. Note
       that the amplitudes of heave  motion are overestimated  in the range of the resonance  frequency and
       underestimated for the cancellation frequency. This is of course due to the lack of viscous effects in the
       hydrodynamic analysis. Indeed, the excessive heave resonance motions provide a positive side effect,
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311