Page 379 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 379

354













                            Figure 4: Comparison of average percentage error for power
                            function regression, neural network and Bayesian network.


                   0
                  %s
                  a
                  $3
                  E=
                   0
                   5
                   0
                                mu
                           (a) Breadth, B.                    (b) Length, L.
                            Figure 5: Comparison of parameters calculated by use of a
                         Bayesian network power function regression and a neural network.
            and L, respectively. For the breadth, it is seen that the Panmax behaviour is captured well by the neural
            and the Bayesian networks. However, the prediction of the output in the upper range differs for the
            three methods, which is due to the scattered and sparse data in that range. Good accordance for the
            length, L, is observed from the results of the neural and the Bayesian networks.


            4  MULTIPLE INPUT REGRESSION

            With  a Bayesian network, it is possible to insert evidence on multiple variables without having to
            relearn the network. For multiple inputs, a designated neural network has to be learned for given inputs
            and outputs. The ability of the networks to use  multiple, concurrent inputs (restrictions/demands) is
            shown by use of examples below.
            4.1 Large Container Vessel

            If for instance the main particulars of a 4100 TEU container vessel should be estimated, evidence is
            inserted in the Bayesian network on the state TEU E [3932,4832] and propagation is performed. The
            probability distributions for the rest of the variables are now updated according to this evidence, of
            which bar charts of the displacement and the draught are shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), respectively.
            It is seen that a displacement range between approx. 72,000 and 94,000 tonnes and a draught of approx.
            13 m are estimated by  the Bayesian network to  be  more  likely  than other values. Still, there is a
            noticeable  probability  of  the  draught  being  as large  as  14.5m.  The  same  range  of  capacity
            (TEU={3932, 4832))  is applied to the neural network  and the power function regression, and they
            predict values near the estimate of the Bayesian network. The result of this computation is shown in
            Figures  6(a) and  6(b) as intervals labelled 'neural  network, single input'  and  'simple  regression,'
            respectively.
   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384