Page 66 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 66

41

                                         TABLE 4
                        MAIN DIMENSIONS OF THE PROTOTYPE AND RENOVATION
                                    I                         renovation
                       Type of barge        prototype
                      Length overall         75.00111          79.00m
                     Length on waterline     73.50111          77.50111
                        Breadth              16.00111          16.00m
                         Depth               4.50111           4.50m
                        Draught              3.80111           3.50m

      The model test was carried out by three kinds of stem. The results are demonstrated in figure 3.
      Some conclusions can be drawn from the test:
      1) Comparing with the prototype, in the full scale, the resistance of the simply cutting stem reduce 15%
      at speed lOkm/h.
      2) The resistance of the tunnel cutting stem reduces 19.3% at speed lOkm/h comparing with prototype.
      3) In order to ensure the freeboard on the sea area route, the deadweight for the tunnel cutting stem
      barge has to reduce 130t. Under this condition, the resistance can be reduced 26.9% at lOkm/h.
      Considering the resistance and the cost for the rebuilding, the simply cutting stem was selected as the
      renovated barge's bodylines. The structure and other performance were designed based  on the direct
      calculation or related regulations. The rebuilding barge was suitable for coasting line. The structure and
      the general arrangement are shown in figure 4.


                             Resistance  of full scale
                   j    12000
                   I
                     -  10000
                     2  8000                       +simply   cutting
                     v                                stern
                     aJ
                        6000                       -tunnel   cutting
                                                      stern
                     u
                     Y)
                     'z   4000                     +prototype
                     2
                        2000
                          0   -
                                6   8   10   12   14
                                  Speed (km/h)
                                     Figure 3:  Test result


      5  CONCLUSIONS
      The pushing fiame for the sea is reliable. It is convenience for the tug and barge to connect or separate.
      The frame makes the tug and barge linked rigidity as whole in the transverse direction while can roll in
      the longitudinal direction, which can ensure the safety of the fleet when navigating on the sea.

      The current speed range measured in the test is from 3km/h to 13km/h. It is difficult for hybrid fleet to
      navigate counter-current flow in high flow speed. In order to navigate safely all the year, the design
      speed should be higher than 14km/h. But too high design speed is not suitable from economic point of
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71