Page 134 - Practical Ship Design
P. 134

Weight-Based Designs                                                 101


           Provided  a  good  “basis”  ship  is  available  and  the  corrections  for  known
        differences are made with care the method is the best available short of detailed
        calculations  (see  later), which  are  time  consuming  and  difficult  to make  with
        worthwhile accuracy at the early design stage.
           A warning about the accuracy of square number proportioning may be taken
        from Fig. 4.12, which is a modified version of  the figure presented in the  1976
        paper. This shows that even for a particular type of ship the ratio outfit weight/
        square number is not always constant, although near constant values do seem to
        apply to general cargo ships and container ships.
           On the  other hand,  values  slowly  diminishing  with  length  seem to  apply to
        tankers and bulk carriers, possibly because some items such as the accommodation
        on these ships vary only slightly with ship size.
           In the 1976 paper the comment was made that the value of the ratio for passenger
        ships increased quite rapidly with length, probably reflecting the increase in  the
        number of decks which tended to go with increasing length and breadth emphas-
        king the fact that for these ships volume is a better parameter than area.
           When data for modern cruise liners was added to this graph it was found to be
        much higher than the 1976 line suggesting that the latter was now out of date. The
        reason for this difference  appears to be the extra decks which  ships of  a given
        length now have, which naturally increases the outfit weight per square metre of
        L  x B. To maintain satisfactory stability, the breadth of these modern ships has
        been increased relative to their length reducing the LIB ratio to near 6 as opposed to
        about 8+ for the ships which formed the basis of the  1976 plot. It may be worth
        noting that the lower speeds of the cruise liners permitted this change without there
        being an unacceptable penalty on powering.
           This reasoning suggested that the new data might be reconciled with the  1976
        spots if both were plotted on a base of beam rather than length and the result is Fig.
        4.13.
           The passenger line of the original 1976 plot has now been replaced in Fig. 4.12
        by a series of lines of different LIB values with the 1976 spots falling happily into
        place. There is a lesson to be  learnt here.  In  1976 the available data seemed to
        justify the line given at that time but the base used can now be seen to be inherently
        wrong. It is vitally important that all approximate formula have a rational scientific
        basis if they are to continue to be relevant with significant design changes.
           Reverting to Fig. 4.12, it may be noted that a line for frigates and corvettes has
        been added.
           The use of this type of graph for warships is complicated by the fact that, as
        discussed  in  $04.1.1 and 4.4.6 and  again in  relation to specification  writing  in
        Chapter 17 and to cost estimating in Chapter  18, outfit is not a concept used by
        warship designers. But as a number of warship designers are used to merchant ship
        practice and because outfit can be a helpful concept at the initial design phase a line
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139