Page 439 - Practical Well Planning and Drilling Manual
P. 439

Section 3 revised 11/00/bc  1/17/01  12:00 PM  Page 415








                                                                                  3.6.6
                                                                      Drill Bits  [     ]



                       3.6.6. Post-Drilling Bit Analysis

                           Proper analysis of the bit run is important to improve future per-
                       formance. A large problem is that different people will grade a particu-
                       lar bit differently. The IADC 8 point grading scheme is vastly better
                       than the old TBG grading, however, if gradings are not done with care,
                       it will mislead future drillers.
                           Record grading details and comments on the bit report. Update
                       recommendations in the field operational notes. Make more extensive
                       comments and recommendations in the end of section report for inclu-
                       sion in the final well report.
                           The IADC 8 point grading should always be used to grade bits. The
                       first four digits refer to the cutting structure. The last four digits refer
                       to other characteristics.
                           IADC 8 point grading scheme.
                           Digits one and two—tooth wear (cutting structure, tooth/cutter
                       wear). The first digit relates to the teeth which do not touch the bore-
                       hole wall. The second digit relates to the remaining teeth. Grade the
                       tooth with the most wear in eighths, where 0 is no wear and 8 is total-
                       ly worn down to the cone.
                           The IADC recommends that tooth breakage be taken into account
                       when grading wear, but this should be done with care. Tooth wear and
                       tooth breakage are two different characteristics that have different
                       causes and should not be confused. If, for example, 50% of the teeth
                       were broken (perhaps due to bit bouncing on bottom) and the other
                       50% were worn to two-eighths, then under the IADC the grading
                       would be a 6 or 7. Someone looking at this grading later would assume
                       that the 6 or 7 meant that the teeth were almost worn away and may
                       change the bit selection based on that. Knowing that the tooth wear
                       was moderate but breakage was present, it may be concluded that the
                       cutting structure was broadly suitable for the application, but that
                       drilling parameters and/or the BHA should be changed (such as by run-
                       ning a shock sub).
                           Digits three and four (cutting structure, characteristics, and location).
                       If more than one major cutting structure wear characteristic is present,
                       enter here the most severe (that which has the greatest effect on bit per-
                       formance). If tooth wear and breakage are both present, do not enter
                       WT here (the fact that the teeth are worn will be obvious from the first


                                                     415
   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444