Page 132 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 132

106
 PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   EQUILIBRIUM THEORY                        107
 where the  products of the  average molar flow  rates and  time are:
             4.4.1  Four-Step  PSA Cycle:  Pressurization with  Product
          The cycle covered in this sect10n is shown in Figure 4.1, and it  is probably the
 (4.15)
          simplest  PSA cycle,  at  ieast  from  a  mathemat1cal  v1ewpomt.  One  result  of
          that s1molicity 1s  that 1t  has been possible to extend the equilibrium theory, in
 ( 4.16)   closed  form,  to  systems  exhibitmg  noniinear  isotherms.~  For  the  sake  of
          clarity, although generality 1s  sacrificed,  the discussion  1s  given  here  m  terms
 Fot steps  m which  pressure  1s  constant,  the influent  flow  rate or effluent   of a  specific type of mixture, viz .•  m  which  th·e  light component  has  a linear
          isotherm  while  the  isotherm  for  the  heavy  component  1s  nonlinear  (e.g.,  a
 flow  rate  can  be  set  to complete the  stcn within  the  allocated  step  time.  No
           Langmuir or quadratic isotherm). When both  isotherms arc pract1callv linear,
 matter which is spedfied, the other can be easily determined if both composi~
           the  equations  presented  here  can  be  easily  s1mplified,  and  when  both  are
 lions  are 'known,  vra  Eo.  4.5  or  4.10,  cteoending  on  whether  a  shock  front
           nonlinear,  the  preceding  equations  can  be  adapted,  although  the  resulting
 exists in  the column.
 For  steps  m  which  oressure  vanes,  it  1s  easier  to  specify  the  rate  of   expressions become somewhat more comolicated.
             As  mentioned  previously,  step  times,  veiocities,  and  molar  flow  rates  are
 pressure change, because the volumetric flow  rate vanes as pressure changes.
 Emoloying Ea. 4.5,  Eo.  4.16 can  be  written  as:   mterrelated  through  matenal  balances.  Therefore;  smce  the  mfluent  and
           effluent moles requued for a certain step are fixed  by  Eqs. 4.13  through 4.19,
 Q -  !Slt:p  =  f''"'Q  dt   (4.17)   the  choice  of step  time  really  only  affects  the  mterstitial  velocity.  For some
 dP dP
 0         steps  that  ch01ce  1s  cnt1cal.  For example 1  during the  feed  step  the  flow  rate
           affects the apparent selecttv1ty, as suggested in  Figure 4.3, as well as pressure
 For some  steps,  it  iS  convement  to  determine  the  flows  from  the  molar
           ctroo.  In  contrast,  the  time  allotted  for  the  purge  step  1s  usually  chosen  m
 contents of the coiumn, when the composition orofiles are known.  For either   order to synchronize steos occurrmg m parallel beds. Pressure drop and mass
 A  or B,  the contents are:
           transfer  rates  are  normally  of  little  importance  while  ourgmg.  From  a
           mathematical  viewpoint,  the  veloc1t1es  m  the  feed  and  purge  steps  are
 N,  - JL[ee, + (1  - •Jf;(c;}IAcsdz   ( 4.18)   governed  by  the  rates  at  which  the  shock  and  Stmole  waves  propagate
 0
           through  the  bed,  as  given  by  Eos.  4.5,  4.7,  4.9,  and  4.10.  These  equations
 where {  1s  the isotherm function, given by Eu. 4.2. This relation 1s eqUJvaient   reiatc  the  interstitial  velocity,  the  length  of the  bed,  the  step  time,  and  the
 to the column  tsotherm  mentioned m Section 4.3.  In  the same vem, the total   column  isotherm, as follows:
 column contents are obtained by summing the amounts of both components.
                vin,IF =  L/6A                                       ( 4.20}
               Vin!lpu = L/{3A                                       (4.21)
 NTOTAL- J"(ee + (I - •)lJA(cA)  + f.(c.}l)Acsdz   ( 4.19)
 0         Note  that the feed  step  1s  assumed  to oroduce  the :_pure  light  component  at
           high pressure, so  in  Ea.  4.20  BA=  BiPu, y  =  0, Yi.).  Furthermore,  since  in
 Now  these  balance  equat10ns  can  be  combined  to  predict  the  overall
           Eo. 4.21  the purge gas 1s also presumed to be pure, /3 A  = f3 .. ,.,•  In this section,
 oerformance  of some  PSA  cycles.  As  discussed  in  Chapter 3,  the  simolest
 PSA  cycles  emoloy  four  steps,  so  they  will  be  considered  first.  The  steps   the light comoonent 1s  assumed to  have a  linear isotherm, so m  the followmg
                     8
 comprise:  oressunzation either by  feed or product, feed at constant pressure   treatment _f3 - {3 = 0 8 •
                          80
             Accordmgly,  the  moles  required  for  the  feed  and  purge  s,teos  mav  be
 until  breakthrough  ts  imminent,  countercurrent  blowdown,  and  complete
           determmed from  Eos. 4.13  through 4.21  as
 purge  (so  that  all  of  the  heavy  component  1s  exhausted).  The  version
 6
 employing feed  for  pressurization  1s  usually called the  Skarstrom  cycle, and   Q,,tlF - ,j,.r,! Pf3A,,/0A   ( 4.22)
 1s  discussed  in  Section  3.2.  Several  vanations  of the  Skarstrom  cycie  have
 been  analyzed via  the  local  equilibrium  theory,  including steps with  incom-  Q,,tlru =  <Pf3A,,lf3A  =  </>,   (4.23)
 1 9
 plete  purge, -  simultaneous  pressurization  and  feed  and strnuitaneous  feed
 and  cocurrent blowdown,w  cocurrent  blowdown,  11   rinse,  12   etc.  As shown  m
 Sect10ns  4.4.i-6,  the  final  results  of  those  models  are  surpnsmgly  simple.
 Futhermore,  experiments  conducted  over  a  wide  range  of conditions  have
 confirmed  their validity, as shown  m Section 4.5.   and  K;  ts  the  Henry's law coefficient of component  i.
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137