Page 172 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 172

146   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   EQUILIBRIUM THEORY                147
 In this case the power cost has been reduced by 37%, and the adsorbent cost   lead  to  composition  and  thermai  waves  that  propagate  toward  the  product
 has been reduced b}'  13%. In addition, this system does not require a vacuum   end of the column. For many PSA applicat1ons, these fronts comcide, and the
 oumo  or  as  many  valves  (e.g.,  for  blowctown  m  successive  stages),  so  the
        induced  temperature  shifts  Just  due  to  adsorotwn  are  often  greater  than
 entire system  1s  s1moler and less expensive. A final,  subtle 001nt  that has  not   l0°C  and  may  exceed  50°C  (Garg  and  Yon  29 ).  It  1s  shown  iater  that
 been taken  into account  1s  that the cycle  time could  possibly  be  reduced  for   temperature shifts dunng a  typical  PSA cycle need not significantly affect the
 this  case  (smce  less  uotaKe  and  release  occur),  which  would  lead  to  less   adsorption select1v1ty, even  though relatively large changes m absolute capac-
 reQmred adsorbent, and a further reduction  m cost.   ity  may  occur.  For  systems  with  small  amounts  of  a  strongly  adsorbed
        contaminant or·a very  weakly  adsorbed  carrier,  however,  the  thermal  wave
       , may  lead  the  composition  wave  (see  Section  2.4)  anct  111  such  cases  the
        adsorption seiect1v1ty can  be  drarnat1cally  affected.
 4.8  Heat Effects   Temperature  profiles  for  a  typical  bulk  seoaratmn  application  are  shown
        m  Figure 4.20.  That figure  shows  the internai column  temperatures dunng a
 The.  term  heat  effect  1s  frequently  applied  to  a  conspicuous  change  m   PSA cycle m which oxygen 1s  bemg separated from air usmg zeolite 5A with a
 performance  that  coincides  with  a  temperature  fluctuation.  Although  the   pressure  swing  of  1  to  5  atm.  Five  thermocouples  were  olacect  at  the
 term  1s  introduced  here,  1t  1s  covered  more  quantitatively  m  Section  5.4.   centerline of the column at equal spacings. They were small and had exposed
 Viewing a packed bed  oressure swing adsorotton system, there are two roam   Junct10ns  for  fast  response. The pressunzat1on step (up: to 39 s)  appears as a
 heat  effects:  heat 1s  released  as a  heavy coriioonent  displaces a  light compo.   linear  increase  of temperature  measured  at  all  the  thermocouples.  Durmg
 nent due to the preferential uptake, and compression raises the gas tempera-  the  feed  step  (contmuing  to  149  s),  the  temperature  JS  stable  until  the
 ture.  Of  course,  heatmg  due  to  adsorpt10n  and  compress10n  1s  at  least   cornoosition front  passes,  and  then a sharp nse occurs  and a  new  oiateau  1s
 partially  reversible,  since  desorption  and  deoressurization  both  cause  the   reached. Simultaneous measurements  indicate  that  for  this  system  the  tern•
 temoerature to drop. The relative magmtuctes of such temperature swings are
 affected  by heats of adsorption,  heat capacities,  and  rates of heat  and  mass
 transfer.  Hence,  the  potential  effects  on  performance are  many,  and  they
                                                    Btowdown
 deoend  on  operating  conditions,  Properties,  and  geomet,ry,  sometimes  m   Pressurization   Feed   Purge
 comolicated  ways.  For examnle,  at  a  constant  pressure,  a  cycle  of adiabatic   40
 adsorption  followed  by  adiabatic desorption  involves  less uptake and release
 than  the  isothermal  counterpart.  As  a  result,  one  might  expect  poorer   35
 oerformance from  an adiabatic system  as  opposed  to  an  isothermal  system,   u
 but that is  not necessarily true for PSA, as shown later.   1   2   3   4   5
 The  term  heat effects  has  aComred  a  connotation  of mystery  and confu-  w   30
               a:
 sion.  This  is  especially  true  in  the field  of PSA since  many  different  effects   :,
               .,
               r
 Occur s1mt.iitaneouSly. ·Thus, determmmg cause-and•effect relationships ts  not   25
               a:
 t'riviai.  In  fact,  some  unusual  thermal  behavior  was  revealed  m  a  patent   w
               0.
 disclosure  hy  Collins 28   that  continues  to  perplex  some  mctustnal  nractition•   ::E   20
               w
 Crs.  Collins  stated  that,  "Contrary  to  the  pnor  art  teachings  of  uniform   ....
 adsorbent bed  temperature during pressure swing  air seoaration, 1t  has been
 unexoectedly  discovered  that  these  them1ally  isolated  beds  experience  a   15
 sharpiy deoressect  temperature zone m the adsorot1on  bed mlet end .... The
 temperature depression  hereil1.before ·described  does not occur m  adsorbent   10
 beds  of  less  than  12  inches  effective  diameter."  Without  attempting  to   0   25   50   75  100  125  15U  175  200
 unravel those observations,  it  may  be  instructive to consider what happens in
                                       TIME   (s)
 a small coiumn,  to see detailed  effects directly and  to mfer their causes, anct
 to become  aware of the  range of potential effects.   ~igure 4.20  Bed temperature histories for a four-step PSA cyde, from pressurization
 For most systems,  the  principal  heat effect  anses from  simuitaneous axial   through purge. The numbers  l  through 5 indicate thermocouple  locatmns m the bed,
        from  near  the  feed  end  m  near  the  product  end.  The  opplkatmn  is  production  of
 bulk How,  adsorption, and heat release due to adsorption. These phenomena
        oxygen  from  air with  zcoiite 5A. The  pressure  range  1s  from  1.0  t/J  5.0  atm.
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177