Page 168 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 168

142   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   EQUILIBRIUM THEORY
                                                                       143
 i.O      4. 7  Design Example
 Chan-HUI-Wong  Model  --
 Kno11b•I-HIII  Model   --
          Ordinarily,  open-ended  (lcs1gn  of  a  PSA  system  might  mean  an  involved
 0.8      opt1m1zat10n  of the  production  rate,  pressures  (and  other  operating  condi-
          tions),  adsorbent,  steps  within  the  cycle,  and  equipment.  Conversely,  to
          design  a  PSA  system  for  a  specific  application  is  more  straightforward,
 >-  0.6   =  O.i   because  one would  be  given soecifications for  the  feed  and ourified  product
 °'       streams and oerhaos the adsorbent.  Important steps :for  that case,  which  1s
 uJ
 >
 0        really a subset of an  open-ended design, include: obtammg relevant isotherms
 0
 uJ       and  other  properties,  seiectmg  a  PSA  cycle,  est1rnatmg  recovery  of  the
 °'   0.4
 =  0.5   desired  product  at  vanous  operating  pressures  (assuming  that  sufficient
          oroduct  ourity  could  be  attained),  determinmg  poWer  reqrnrements  and
          adsorbent  bed  sizes  associated  with  each  ooeratmg  oressure  range,  and
 0.2
          finally  estimatmg 'the  costs  of the  adsorbent.  power,  vessels,  valves,  etc.  to
 P =  0.9   arnve  at  the  total  cost.  Detailed  design  considerations  would  address  the
 0.0  1 oo   product purity question,  and  ancillary details that  affect the oot1mum  condi-
          tions,  and  therefore  the  cost.  Such  details,  though,  ar,e  beyond  the scope  of
 i        this example. The ouroose here is  to illustrate rough Sizing of a specific  PSA
          system,  generally  followmg  the  steps  listed,  and  emriloymg  the  eauilibnum
 Figure 4.19  Recovery versus fJ for  various adsorbent selecttvities,  yl.l , = 0.1  accord-  I   theory.
 1
 mg  to  the  motlcl of Knaebel and  Hill.   The  application  considered  here  1s  production  of .100  Nm·'  per  hour  of
         oxygen  (at  4.0  bar)  from  air,  which  1s  at amhieni  pressure  and  temperature.
         To avoid  possible confusion  m  dealing with  too  many degrees of freedom,  a
         number of arbitrary chmces are made so that  the focus  can  be  kept on  PSA
 with  feed.  This  section  bnefly  discusses  the  aualitattve  and  auant1tattve   rather  than  auxiliary  issues.  For  examoie,  one  wou'ld  ordinarilv  consider
 differences between Eas.  4.29 and 4.30.   pretreatment of the  feed  to  remove  contaminants that  could  reduce  adsorp-
 The approach follows  that of the  previous sect10n  in which conditions are   tion  capacity  (e.g.,  m  this  case  mtegrating  desiccant with  this  system).  For
 chosen  first  to  be  reasonably valid  for  both models;  the conditions  are  then   s1rnplic1ty,  however, the air fed  to this system is  assumed to be dry and free of
 aitered to vioiate the simpler model. In both cases the model predictions are   contaminants.  Thus,  only  the  main  constituents  f nitrogen  (78.03% ),  oxygen
 compared to show the Jl1agmtudes of the  potential errors due to overslmoli-  (20.99%), and  argon (0.94%),  1.e.,  99.96% of "standard" a,rl are considered.
 fication.  Generally, Figures 4.18 and 4.19 comoare the modeis of Chan et al.   In  addition,  the  adsorbent  1s  chosen  to  be  zeolite  5A.  Comcidentally,  the
 and  Knaebel  and  Hill·  by  showing. the  deoendenc_e  of  recovery  on  §J  for   adsorot1on  isotherms  of  argon  and  oxygen  on  5A  rzeolite  are  practlcally
 vanous adsorbent selectiv1t1es. Specifically, Figure 4.18 shows relatively close   identical,  so  argon  is  treatf:ct  as  oxygen  in  the  PSA. analysis.  Sel~cting  the
 predict10ns  for ,YA, - 0.1  (y ,  - 0.9).  Conversely,  Figure  4.19  shows  larger   operatmg temperature  to  be  45° Censures that the· isotherms are essentrnlly
 8
 discrepancies  between the predicted recoveries,  especially at lower  pressure   linear up to about  6 atm (so  there  1s  no  effect of absolute  pressure on  PSA
 ratios,  for  yAF = 0.5 { = y F).  It should  be emphasizect that the  lower values   performance).  In  addition,  at  that  temperature  the  adsorbent-adsorbate
 8
 are  considered  to  be  more  accurate,  because  the  assumptions  are  less   mteract1ons are  charactenzed by  {3A  - 0.10003,  e  - 0.478,  p  8   - 810  kg/m',
 restrictive.  In  both  figures,  the  differences  dimimsh  as  the  pressure  ratio   and  (3  = 8  - 0.593.  20
 mcreases,  implying  that  the  tmpact  of  compos1t1on  dependence  on  gas   Even  within  these  constramts,  there  remam  mariy 'Options:  for _opcratmg
 velocity  becomes  relatively  smaller.  Both  of  thOse  figures  also  show  that   conditions,  one  could  opt1m1ze  the  oressure  ratio,  ,extent  of  oUrge,  and
 maximum  recovery occurs at an  mtermediate pressure ratio for systems with   possibly  the  pressure  maniouJat,on  Scheme  (cf.  Sections  4.4.1-4.4.4).  One
 moderate .to iow selecttvities•(i.e., fJ  >  0.4). Such behav10r is not observed for   cou_ld  ~-!so  consider producing purified  nitrogen as a  byproduct via a five~step
 the  custi  of pressurizntlon  with  product,  except  for  nonlinear  isotherm:-.  at   cycle, since  ii offers very high  potcntrnl oxygen  recovery (cf. Section 4.4.5). To
 relatively high values of PL·   be concise, however, only  two  four~sten  PSA cycles  are evaluated  here,  both
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173