Page 59 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 59

34                                     PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION                 FUNDAMENTALS OF ADSORPTION                                   35

               Table 2.5.   {Cm1111med)                                                           Table 2.6.  Pore Structure of Typical Adsorbents
                                         Temp. range   Press.  rnnge                                 l lomogeneous-Un1mnd<1I  Pore Size   Comrosnc-Bim(1d<1l  Pore Size
                   Sorbent     Snrha!c      (K)         (atm)       Reierem:c                                Distribution                Distribution

                 SA Zeolite               144         1.0         Danner  25                         Silica Gel                  Carbon Molecular Sieves
                                          172-273     1.0         Noian-n                            Activated Alumina            Pe!kted Zeolites
                 CMS(Takeda)              195-323     1-11.0      Kawozoe  34                        Activated Carbon            Macroreucutar ion exchange resins
                 CMS(BF)                  303         0-0.9       Ruthven~~                          Homogeneous 10n exchange resms
                                          190-273     0-0.9       Ruthven  14
                 CMS(Takcda)              77          0-fl_{)     llorvalh.n
                                          77-323      0-(L(J      Kawazoe- 14
                 CMS(BF)                  273-33:\    0-0.9       RuthvenH
                                                                                               comoosi!e (Table  2.6).  These  are illustrated  m  Figure 2. 13.  In the "homoge-
                 See also  Adsorption Equilibrium  Data  Hmulbook,  D.  P.  Va\en:rncla and A.  L  Mvers,  Prentice  Hall.
               Englewood Cliffs,  N.J. (19K9), which provides .t useful summarv ol the  av:1ilablc  adsorpll!ln ClJuilibm1m   neous" actsorhcnts the pore structure persists, on  the same scale. ttiroughout
               data  for  a wide rnnge ot svstems.                                             the  entire  particle:  so  the  distribut10n  of pore  size ·is  unimodal.  Bv  contrast
                                                                                               the composite  adsorbent oart1cles are  formed by aggregation of small  micro-
                                                                                               porous  m1crooart1cles,  sometimes  with  the  aid  of  a  hinder.  As  a  result  the
              isotherm daia with literature references. The molecules of argon, oxygen, and    ~ore  size  dist-ribui1011  has  a  well-defined  bimodal  chantctcr with  m1cropores
              nitrogen are of similar size  and polanzabilitv so  their van  der Waals mterac-
                                                                                               ~ithin  the  m1cropart1cles  connected  through  the·  rnacropores  within  the
              t1ons  are similar.  As  a  result  nonoolar  adsorbents show very  tittle selectivity   oellet.
              hetween  these  species,  as  exemplified  tly  the  s1milanty  m  the  1sotllerms  for   In  a  composite  adsnrheni  there  are  three  distmct  res1stances  to  mass
               nitrogen  and  oxygen  on  a carbon  molecular sieve  (Figure  2.11 ).  By  contrasi,
                                                                                               transfer, as illustra1cd  in  Figure 2.14.  Under practic,i.1  conditmns of opcrntH1n
              tt1e  alurnrnum-nch  zeolites  show  preferential  adsorntwn  of  niirogen  as  a
                                                                                               the  external  film  resistance  1s  seldom,  if  ever,  rate  limiting;  so  that  the
               result  of the  field  gradient Quadrupole  1nteract1on  energy.  5A zeolite  1s  the
                                                                                               sorpt1on/desorot1on  rate  1s  generally  controlled  bv  either  macrooorc  or
              most  commonly  used  adsorbent  for  air  separation  (to  produce  oxygen)  and   m1crooore diffusion or by  the combined effects of these  resistances.
               the  separation  factor  (essentially  the  same  as  the  ratio  of Henry  constants)   A  proper  understanding  of  kinetic  effects  m  PSA  svstems  therefore
               for  this  adsorbent  1s  at1out  3.3  at  ambient  conditions (sec  Figure 2.12).  This   requires an understanding of-the  mechanisms of both  macropore  anti  m1cro-
               value  1s  almost independent of co111oos1t1on  m  conformity with  the  Langmuir   po~e  diffus10n.  Only  a  bnef summary  1s  given  here;  u  more  detaiied  account
               model. The separation factors  for  most other commerc1ai  zeolites are similar   has  been given  by  Karger and  Ruthven. 411
               although very  much  higher seoaratton factors (8-10) have  been  reported  by
               Coe for well dehydrated Ca  X  or Li  X  as well as for Ca or Li  chabaz1tes.  38 3
                                                                            • 1l
                 The electric field  gradient within a  zeolite 1s  enhanced by  the presence of
                               2
               divalent  cation  (Ca + ).  However,  anv  traces  of moisture  can  lead  to  cation
               hydroiys1s,  leading to tlle formation  of two smgly charged ions:
                   Caz++ 2H 0=CaOH++ H,o+                                (2.22)
                            2                                                                                                                  \
               with consequent loss of mtrogen select1vttv.
                                                                                                                                       M1croporous  J
                                                                                                                                     -micro--particle
               2.3  Adsorption Kinetics
                                                                                                                    lo>                 lb)
               The  raie  of phys1cai  adsorptmn  1s  gcncrnlly controlled  by  diffusional  lirmta-
                                                                                               Figure 2.13  Two common  1ypcs  of microporous a<lsorhcnL  (;1)  lfomogcnc<H1<;  parti-
               t10ns  rather  t11an  by  the  actual  rate  of equilibrat10n  at  a  surface, which,  for
                                                                                                cle with a wide  range  oi pore  size (e.g., activated  alumma  or silica  geL'(b) Composite
               ohys1cal  adsorption, 1s  normally very  rapid.  From  the oersoect1ve of sorptton   pellet  formed  hv  aggregat10n  of  small  microporous  microparticlcs  (e.g.,  zeolite  or
               kinetics, adsorbents mav be divided into two broad classes:  homogeneous and     carbon molecular sieve  adsorbents).
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64