Page 151 - Principles and Applications of NanoMEMS Physics
P. 151

3. NANOMEMS PHYSICS: Quantum Wave Phenomena                   139


             Specifically, the properties of these structures are given by arguments
             advanced by Bragg [64], whose essence (for a 2-D periodic lattice) is that
             the  path  difference (phase shift) between incoming and scattered rays,
                    G
                        G
                 G
             ∆  =  ⋅ a  (k − k′ ), see Fig. 3-27(b), determines whether the transmission of the
             structure exhibits a maximum  or a  minimum; a maximum when  ∆  is  an
                                                  G
                                               G
             integer multiple of  π2 , and a minimum when it is an odd multiple of  π. For
                                            G
             a 3-D PBC, on the other hand, ∆  = R ⋅ (k − k′ ) must be valid simultaneously
                          G
             for all vectors  R  that are Bravais lattice vectors [64].
               A  large  number  of computational techniques to obtain the properties of
             general  PBCs have been developed, most of  which derive from the solid
             state physics literature on computing band structures [162]-[166]. Obviously,
             it would be impossible to engage in detailing these techniques here, thus we
             instead provide a number of analytical results derived by Joannopoulos et al.
             [162] that capture some general  properties of  PBCs  and  facilitate  one’s
             intuition when thinking about them.
             3.2.2.2.1  General Properties of PBCs


               Initially, techniques for computing the properties of dielectric  PBCs
             exploited previously introduced methods for computing the band structures
             of semiconductors. Indeed, a comparison between the equations of quantum
             mechanics  (QM), used to  describe semiconductors, and electromagnetics
             (EM), used to describe dielectric PBCs, shows many similarities, Table 3-1.

                  Table 3-1. Comparison between quantum mechanics and electromagnetics
                                    formulations.  [159].   G     G
                                             G
                                                                    G
                Field            Ψ ( ) t,r G  =  Ψ ( )er  iω t  H ( ) Ht,r G  =  ( )er  iω t
                                                            G
                                                                      G
                                                                    2
                Eigenvalue problem   H Ψ  = E Ψ           Ξ H = ( cω  ) H
                                          2
                Hermitian operator    − (= ∇  2 )  G            § 1     ·
                                 H =          +  V () r   Ξ  = ∇ ×  ¨ ¨  G  ∇ × ¸ ¸
                                        2 m                     © ε () r  ¹
               A key difference, however, which restricts the general applicability of the
             QM formulation to solve  PBC  problems  is the  scalar nature  of the  QM
             problem compared to  the vector nature of  the EM  problem.  Fortunately,
             however, unlike the QM semiconductor band structure problem, in which the
             Bohr radius introduces a fundamental length scale and, as a result, similar
             lattices with differing dimensions give  rise to different behaviors, the  EM
             problem possesses no fundamental length scale constant. This means that the
             properties of PBCs which differ only via a length expansion or contraction
             of all distances, are related by simple expressions. In particular, given an EM
             eigenmode obeying the equation,
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156