Page 176 - Principles of Applied Reservoir Simulation 2E
P. 176

Part II: Reservoir Simulation  161


       tered geometry is the most straight forward technique, but comer-point geometry
       has gained popularity  because it yields more visually realistic  representations
        of reservoir architecture.  This is valuable when making presentations to people
        who are nonspecialists. The different geometric representations are  illustrated
        for a two-layer dipping reservoir in Figure 16-5. Although corner-point geometry
        is  visually  more  realistic,  it  is  easier  to  define  a  grid  with block-centered
        geometry. Block-centered  geometry requires the specification of the lengths of
        each  side  of  the  block  and  the  block  center  or  top.  Corner-point  geometry
        requires specifying the location of all eight corners of the block. This is most
        readily accomplished with a computer program.










         Conventional Grid with  Dip-Aligned Grid with  Dip-Aligned Grid with
         Rectangles            Rectangles            Parallelograms

       Figure  16-5. Geometric representations of a dipping reservoir.
             There is little computational difference between the results of corner-point
       and  block-centered  geometry.  One  caution  should  be  noted  with  respect  to
       comer-point geometry. It is possible to define very irregularly shaped grids using
       corner-points.  This  can  lead to  the  distortion  of  flood  fronts  and numerical
       stability problems. Flood  front distortions caused by gridding is an example of
       the grid orientation effect discussed by many authors, including Aziz and Settari
        [1979], and Mattax and Dalton  [1990].
             The  grid  orientation  effect  is  exhibited  by  looking  at  a  displacement
       process in 2D (Figure 16-6). Each producer is equidistant from the single injector
       in a model that has uniform and isotropic properties. If grid orientation did not
       matter, the symmetry of the problem would show that both wells would produce
       injected water at the same time. The figure shows that production is not the same.
       Injected fluids preferentially follow the most direct grid path to the producer.
       Thus, even though the producers are symmetrically located relative to the in-
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181