Page 189 - Principles of Applied Reservoir Simulation 2E
P. 189

174  Principles of Applied  Reservoir Simulation


        the people who commissioned the study. Their views may require using a model
        that has more complexity than required from a technical modeling perspective.
              Non-reservoir requirements include personnel, simulator availability, and
        cost effectiveness. Personnel will be needed to gather and evaluate data, prepare
        input data, perform the history match, and then make predictions. Data gathering
        may take a few days or several months depending on the quality and extent of
        the data base for a particular field. The history matching and prediction phases
        do not necessarily have to be done by the same modeler. In some companies,
        history matching is done in a collaborative effort  between a specialized tech-
        nology center and a field office, while most of the prediction work is completed
        in the  field  office.  This takes advantage  of specialized  expertise: technology
        centers, including outside consultants, routinely set up and ran models, while
        day-to-day  changes that impact production operations  are handled  in the field
        office.  The division  of labor between history matching and prediction makes
        sense in some circumstances.
             A  wide variety of simulators are available for a price. The work horse
        simulators -  black oil and compositional - can often be leased on an as-needed
        basis or are available through computer networks. More specialized simulators
        may be obtained from software vendors, or as publicly available research codes
        developed  at university and government  laboratories.
             As complexity increases, so also does cost. A good economic argument
        to  support  Ockham's Razor  is to remember that the  latest  technology  is not
        always the best technology  for a project, and its use comes with a cost. Modeling
        teams are often tempted to apply the latest technology, even if it is not warranted.
        An example is the use of local grid refinement (LGR) to model horizontal wells.
        LGR  is  an  innovative  grid  preparation  technique  that  can  improve  spatial
        resolution, but at a substantial increase in computer cost and simulator sophisti-
        cation. It is very common to find LGR used to model horizontal wells. In some
        cases, such as feasibility studies, this level of technical detail exceeds the needs
        of the study objectives and simply adds cost to the project without  adding the
        corresponding value. A wise modeling team will match the level of technology
        with the objectives of the study. The result will be the selection of the most cost
        effective  method for achieving study objectives.
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194