Page 169 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 169

156        Process Modelling and Simulation with Finite Element Methods


          the Boundary menu and select boundary settings

              Boundary Mode
                 0   Set up boundary  1 Dirichlet h=l; r=l; (fixed cl=l)
                     Set up bnd 2,3,5,6,7 Neumann q=O; g=O
                 0
                     Apply/OK
          Now pull down the Subdomain menu and select Subdomain settings.

              Subdomain Mode
                     Select domains 1&2
                     Use the multiphysics pull down menu to select the IC NS mode
                     Use the Init Tab to set up u(tO)=tanku(x,y); v(tO)=tankv(x,y);
                     p(tO)=tankp(x,y  1
                     Apply/OK
                     Select cl mode
                     Set coefficients c=l;a=O;f=O;da=l;a=(O,O);~=(u,v),~(O,O)

          Now choose the stationary nonlinear solver and click on the  solve button.  Do
          not be surprised to find rapid convergence to a uniform concentration field and
          the same flow field as in Figure 4.1 1.

          Component 3: Buoyancy effects of solutal mass transport
          Save the  FEMLAB model  as  tank-nscl.mat.  Now pull  down the  Subdomain
          menu and select Subdomain settings.

              Subdomain Mode (ns)
                     Select domains 1&2
                 0   Set Fy=-0.25*cl (Rayleigh number Ra=25)
                     Apply/OK
          Now  choose  the  stationary  nonlinear  solver  and  click  on  the  solve  button.
          Again, do not be surprised that the steady state is a uniform profile, again with
          the driven cavity velocity field.  Next try the time dependent solver with output
          times  0:O.l: 1 .O.   The  final  concentration  profile  (Figure  4.13)  just  shows
          continual  spreading  of  the  concentration  front,  but  no  hint  of  a  stratification
          forming  (see Figure  4.12).  The animation  of  the  time  series for the  velocity
          vectors  is  suitably  unenlightening  - visually  it never  changes from the  driven
          cavity vector field of Figure 4.1  1.
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174