Page 243 - Psychological Management of Individual Performance
P. 243
references 227
O’Driscoll, M. P., & Randall, D. M. (1999). Perceived organisational support, satisfaction with
rewards, and employee job involvement and organizational commitment. Applied Psychology:
An International Review, 48, 197–209.
O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of
group goals on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285–1301.
Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and
locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology,
82, 792–802.
Phillips, J. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. (1996). Prevalence and prediction of positive
discrepancy creation: Examining a discrepancy between two self-regulation theories. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 81, 498–511.
Polzer, J. T., & Neale, M. A. (1995). Constraints or catalysts? Reexamining goal setting with the
context of negotiation. Human Performance, 8, 3–26.
Rasch, R. H. & Tosi, H. L. (1992). Factors affecting software developers’ performance: An
integrated approach. MIS Quarterly, 16, 395–413.
Renn, R. W. (1998). Participation’s effect on task performance: Mediating roles of goal acceptance
and procedural justice. Journal of Business Research, 41, 115–125.
Roberson, L., Korsgaard, A. M., & Diddams, M. (1990). Goal characteristics and satisfaction:
Personal goals as mediators of situational effects on task satisfaction. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 20, 920–941.
Roethlisberger, F. J. (1941). Management and morale. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In
B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1–54).
Chicago, IL: St. Claire Press.
Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001). The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals
on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2000a). The effects of goal setting and group size on performance
in a social dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science.
Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2000b). The concept of goal commitment: Measurement and
relationships with task performance. In R. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions
in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., & Whyte, G. (2000). The effect of self- and group-efficacy on group
performance in a mixed-motive situation. Human Performance, 13, 279–298.
Seijts, G. H., Meertens, R. M., & Kok, G. (1997). The effects of task importance and publicness
on the relation between goal difficulty and performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural
Science, 29, 54–62.
Shoenfelt, E. (1996). Goal setting and feedback as a posttraining strategy to increase the transfer
of training. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 176–178.
Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B., & van den Berg, M. T. C. (1996). Changing
organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 16, 235–246.
Silver, W. S., & Bufanio, K. M. (1996). The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group
task performance. Small Group Research, 27, 347–359.
Smith, K. G., Locke, E. A., & Barry, D. (1990). Goal setting, planning, and organizational
performance: An experimental simulation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision
Processes, 46, 118–134.
Summers, T. P., & Hendrix, W. H. (1991). Modelling the role of pay equity perceptions: A field
study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 145–157.
Tabernero, C., & Wood, R. E. (1999). Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in
self-regulation and performance on a complex task. Organizational Behaviour and Human
Decision Processes, 78, 104–127.
Tan, V., Cheatle, M. D., Mackin, S., Moberg, P. J., & Esterhai, J. L. (1997). Goal setting as
a predictor of return to work in a population of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients.
International Journal of Neuroscience, 92, 161–170.