Page 61 - Purchasing Power Black Kids and American Consumer Culture
P. 61

46  .  The Shadow of  Whiteness

       misinformation  in  the  Moynihan  report.  These  include  a number of
       classics:  Tally's  Corner  (Liebow 1967),  Soulside  (Hannerz  1969),  and,
       more  recently, Ain't No  Makin'  It  (MacLeod  1987). In this  last work,
       Jay MacLeod  looks at two groups of male youths, one white,  one black,
       and  seeks to  understand  the perpetuation  of poverty not  just as being
       generated  from  within,  via the  culture  of poverty,  but  through  a  more
       complex  process  of  social  reproduction  involving  institutional  and
       structural factors. Like sociology, anthropology  has  shown  a  sustained
       interest in questions of U.S. urban poverty and  social inequality (Gregory
       1998;  Mullings  1987;  Sharff  1998;  Susser  1982).
          These empirical responses have been tremendously important,  but be-
       cause few have chosen to attack the images themselves head on social sci-
       ence has to some degree allowed these portrayals to continue their circu-
       lation  unabated (Wilson  1988  is an  exception,  albeit  an unpublished
       one). Scholarly critiques of the assumptions and  ideas behind notions of
       the undeserving poor  or pathological  underclass have given relatively
       little attention to the question  of the symbolic aspects of the debate. The
       field of cultural studies has been an exception, especially the recent  work
       of John  Fiske (1993,  1994),  who  shows  how  power  and  disempower-
       ment can be enacted through material and symbolic channels.  Moreover,
       when young people themselves are consulted  about  their  responses  to
       these images and  symbols, they can propose  options  not  envisioned by
       most other observers. When Dierdre Kelly examined symbolic discourses
       around  teenage pregnancy, three  of the dominant  discourses centered
       around  blaming the girl, blaming  the  family, or  blaming society.  Teen
       mothers themselves, though, asserted that the problem was that the idea
       of blame itself  was wrong  (Kelly  1996).
          Contemporary consumption  is, of course, up to its neck in symbolic is-
       sues, and some theorists, like Wolfgang Haug (1986) and Jean Baudrillard
       (1981,  1986,  1988),  have gone so far as to  argue that symbols are the
       only issue that remains. While I cannot  bring myself  to  go quite this far,
       the  questions of poverty,  racism,  and  social  inequality in  the  United
       States today  are in large part questions  about  consumption  (who buys
       what, who  possesses what, and how do they get it?), which means  that
       they are  questions of symbolic importance  as well. It is therefore un-
       surprising that  symbolic imagery has been one of the primary weapons
       mobilized  in attacks  on the poor and  underclass and that battles have
       often  taken place over the airwaves. As the  old advertising adage  goes,
       "sell the sizzle and not the  steak."
          Gangsta rap, fashion, advertisements, and national newspaper articles
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66