Page 157 - Reading Between the Sign Intercultural Communication for Sign Language Interpreters
P. 157

142   Reading Between the Signs


                              less powerful position who is obliged to respond…” (119–20). The
                              interviewer uses his or her power to start the interaction, intro-
                              duce new topics, change the topic, and terminate the conversa-
                              tion. However, “miscommunication and negative evaluation of-
                              ten arise when participants do not share the same cultural and
                              linguistic background...” (124). The authors stress the importance
                              of discovering underlying patterns of expected responses. One of
                              the most important challenges for the interviewee is that the in-
                              terview questions
                                     are mostly indirect, relying upon the interviewee’s abil-
                                     ity to infer the type of answer wanted…. The inter-
                                     viewee’s ability to go beyond the surface, pick the rel-
                                     evant cues, infer the intended meaning, and effectively
                                     negotiate an acceptable relationship between questions
                                     and responses is an important measure of his/her suc-
                                     cess. (127)
                                 In the job interview scenarios described earlier in this chap-
                              ter, we saw that Deaf applicants, not versed in the unwritten rules
                              of the American job interview game, repeatedly violated the
                              interviewer’s cultural expectations, thereby not presenting them-
                              selves to their best advantage, though they may have been emi-
                              nently qualified for the position. I do not mean to imply, however,
                              that Deaf people never interview well. Of course they do, and
                              they also get hired for many jobs in the hearing world regardless
                              of the fact that they may follow a different set of cultural rules. It
                              is true, however, that Deaf people as a group are underemployed
                              (Schein and Delk 1974; Crammate 1987; Jacobs 1989). I would
                              posit that this results not only from discrimination, fear, and hear-
                              ing people’s lack of information but also from a lack of knowledge
                              on the part of some Deaf people about the cultural set of the job
                              interview. One place to alleviate this lack of information would be
                              in the residential school, where ideally after studying their own
                              Deaf culture in depth, a class in hearing culture, as a contrast
                              culture, should be offered, including a unit on “Cultural Assump-
                              tions in a Hearing American Job Interview.” I am pleased to report
                              that this idea seems to be catching on in several schools. Let us
                              hope that this enlightened trend will continue.













                      06 MINDESS PMKR          142                          10/18/04, 12:01 PM
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162