Page 69 - Reading Between the Sign Intercultural Communication for Sign Language Interpreters
P. 69

54   Reading Between the Signs


                              are so precious that “there is minimal value placed on being ‘on
                              time’ to the next appointment, getting home to sleep, or even
                              finishing the immediate business at hand” (Smith 1996, 190).
                                 Although DST is often used as the reason that meetings start
                              late, there are some instances where punctuality and even show-
                              ing up early are common in order to get a good seat. This is linked
                              to the importance of sight lines and having a good view of the
                              signing. It may apply, therefore, to signed or interpreted plays or
                              lectures.
                                 There is also a cultural difference in timing between Deaf cul-
                              ture and hearing culture with regard to greetings and leave-tak-
                              ing. Hearing Americans practice a greeting ritual that precedes
                              our getting to the point: “Hi.” “Hello.” “How are you?” “Fine thanks,
                              and you?” “Not too bad.” And then on to the matter at hand.
                              Hearing leave-taking is more abrupt: “Great party. Bye.” Deaf cul-
                              ture reverses the pacing of these two interactions. After the hello,
                              they get right to the point without the warm-up and save the long
                              ritual for leave-taking. At a party or other large event, hugs, good-
                              byes, agreeing when to meet again, more hugs, a last bit of news,
                              and so forth can easily continue for half an hour.
                              Polychronic versus Monochronic
                              Polychronic and monochronic are terms coined by Edward T. Hall
                              to describe another distinction regarding time. In monochronic
                              cultures like the United States, Germany, Switzerland, and coun-
                              tries in Scandinavia, time is segmented linearly, and people tend
                              to focus on one thing or person at a time (witness our ever-present
                              date books neatly divided into hourly or smaller units that we
                              often assign one by one till our days are fully booked.) By sched-
                              uling our time so rigidly, we compartmentalize our life, trying to
                              make it manageable by concentrating on only one thing at a time.
                              This process has the side effect of reducing context as we sepa-
                              rate business from pleasure, family from friends, exercise from
                              daily chores, and so on. So deeply ingrained is our system of deal-
                              ing with time that we forget it is not universal. It seems the only
                              logical way to organize our lives in order to make sure that time is
                              not lost or wasted.
                                 In polychronic cultures, such as those of Latin American coun-
                              tries and France, people and relationships take precedence over
                              agendas and schedules. People may carry on several conversa-
                              tions at the same time. This means that if an American is meeting







                      03 MINDESS PMKR          54                           10/18/04, 11:23 AM
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74