Page 81 - Reading Between the Sign Intercultural Communication for Sign Language Interpreters
P. 81

66   Reading Between the Signs


                                7. “describe, then do,” which uses role shift to describe the
                                  manner in which an action was done (Smith 1996, 220).
                                 In her article “Features of Discourse in an American Sign Lan-
                              guage Lecture,” Cynthia Roy discusses several characteristics of
                              ASL that relate to rhetorical style. One feature of ASL is the use of
                              reported speech. Instead of reporting a dialogue between two
                              people in the third person (i.e., he said…then she said…), the
                              speaker/signer constructs a first-person dialogue by assuming the
                              roles of the people involved to make it more dramatic and inter-
                              esting (Roy 1989). There are of course many more elements of
                              rhetorical style in ASL that take advantage of its being a visual
                              language.

                              What Persuades Deaf People?
                              Whom do Deaf people rely on as authorities? “Truths learned from
                              personal experience take precedence over objective evidence….
                              Deaf people…are unimpressed by abstract findings published in
                              books or taught in universities unless they have personal experi-
                              ence consistent with it” (Smith 1996, 232). Interpreting a typical
                              medical appointment, we sometimes run across a certain behav-
                              ior that can illuminate this point. In discussion with the doctor
                              about their medical condition, Deaf people will often relate sto-
                              ries about their friends. If the Deaf patient is suffering from some
                              type of heart ailment, for example, he or she might tell the doctor
                              about another Deaf person who had a similar condition and then
                              go on to describe in detail what type of medication the friend
                              took and with what results. Lacking the understanding that in Deaf
                              culture the peer group serves as the trusted authority, the hearing
                              doctor will usually dismiss this seeming digression and try to get
                              back to the point without ever answering the patient’s implicit
                              question regarding an alternative medication. If a hearing patient,
                              however, were to bring up the same concern about a new blood
                              pressure medication but cite a magazine article or a television
                              news report as the source of the information, it is likely that the
                              doctor would respond to that patient’s concerns directly.

                              Guilty or Innocent?
                              Another aspect of reasoning which is subject to cultural variation
                              is the assignment of guilt or innocence. In Black and White Styles
                              in Conflict, Thomas Kochman contrasts the ways whites and blacks
                              handle accusations and assert their innocence. Whites, if they hear







                      03 MINDESS PMKR          66                           10/18/04, 11:23 AM
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86