Page 110 - Reliability and Maintainability of In service Pipelines
P. 110

Methods for Structural Reliability Analysis 99


           TABLE 3.1 (Continued)
           Model     When to be    Input Variables  Advantages of the  Disadvantages of
                     Applied                     Model          the Model
           ANN models  Deterioration  All variables that  A useful tool for  High levels of skill
                     under very    influence the failure modeling failure rate and training are
                     complex       of a pipe and the  with high degree of  required to develop
                     circumstances and  way the nodes and  nonlinearity, can be  the complex
                     under uncertain  the interconnections utilized for any type  networks, quality
                     environments  are arranged within  of pipe material  labeled data are
                                   the layers (topology)        required for
                                                                supervised training
           Fuzzy logic  Data is scarce and  Variables are  incorporate  Challenges exist in
           models    observations and  assigned a degree of engineering  constructing fuzzy
                     model criteria are  membership on a  judgment to predict  rule sets, selecting
                     subject to    continuous interval  pipe deterioration  membership
                     uncertainties,  (0, 1) based on            functions, and
                     ambiguities, and  expert opinions          determining the
                     contradictions                             defuzzification
                                                                process
           Heuristic  Infrastructure  Engineering  Illustrate failure risks Application is
           models    problems are not  knowledge  with limited or no  limited due to its
                     well understood             pipe data      simplicity
                     (limited or no pipe
                     data)



              References

           Ahammed, M., Melchers, R.E., 1994. Reliability of underground pipelines subject to corrosion.
             J. Transp. Eng. 120 (6), November/December.
           Ahammed, M., Melchers, R.E., 1995. Probabilistic analysis of pipelines subjected to pitting corrosion
             leaks. Eng. Struct. 17 (2).
           Ahammed, M., Melchers, R.E., 1997. Probabilistic analysis of underground pipelines subject to com-
             bined stress and corrosion. Eng. Struct. 19 (12), 988 994.
           Al-Barqawi, H., Zayed, T., 2008. Infrastructure management: Integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate
             municipal water mains’ performance. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14 (4), 305 318.
           Amirat, A., Mohamed-Chateauneuf, A., Chaoui, K., 2006. Reliability assessment of underground pipe-
             lines under the combined effect of active corrosion and residual stress. Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip. 83,
             107 117.
           Benmansour, A., Mrabet, Z., 2002. Reliability of Buried pipes, Asranet (Integrating Advanced
             Structural Analysis with Structural Reliability Analysis) International Colloquium 8 10 July,
             Glasgow, Scotland.
           Berardi, L., Giustolisi, O., Kapelan, Z., Savic, D.A., 2008. Development of pipe deterioration models
             for water distribution systems using EPR. J. Hydroinform. 10 (2), 113 126.
           Camarinopoulos, L., Chatzoulis, A., Frontistou-Yannas, S., Kallidromitis, V., 1999. Assessment of the
             time-dependent structural reliability of buried water mains. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 65, 41 53.
           Cheung, M.S., Kyle, B.R., 1996. Service life prediction of concrete structures by reliability analysis.
             Construct. Build. Mater. 10 (1), 45 55.
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115