Page 270 -
P. 270

258    CHAPTER 9  Ethnography




                             see or hear things that might be both very interesting and potentially sensitive.
                             Examples include comments about a coworker's (or manager's) incompetence
                             or discussion of children hiding certain behavior from parents. Although these
                             observations may be intriguing, fear of repercussions may lead you to be wary
                             of reporting them. How might you deal with this conflict between research
                             fidelity and the trust of your participants?



                         RESEARCH DESIGN EXERCISES

                           1.  Imagine an ethnographic study of how college students use technology to work
                           on group projects. How would you go about designing such a study? You might
                           say that you will pick a class that involves group work, but this is only the
                           beginning—which courses would you consider? Which types of student? Which
                           roles would be appropriate? What sort of data would you collect? How would
                           your answer depend upon your status? In other words, would a college student
                           conducting this study use the same approach as a professor?
                           2.  Conduct a mini-ethnography. Working in a team of two or three, observe a
                           group of people. You might observe students waiting outside a class on campus,
                           families at a playground, friends at a coffee shop, meetings of a student group,
                           or some other similar activity. (As this won't be a formal study, you probably
                           shouldn't interview participants or use other data collection methods, but
                           you can watch and listen in public places.) Write down your observations
                           individually and try to describe what you have seen and learned. Once all group
                           members have done this, meet and discuss your findings. Can you combine
                           your observations and individual models to build a consensus model? Build a
                           model that incorporates all of your conclusions and discusses differences in your
                           findings.



                           REFERENCES
                         Agar, M., 1980. The Professional Stranger. Academic Press, Inc., New York.
                         Angrosino, M., 2007. Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research. Sage, London, England.
                         Balka, E., Bjorn, P., Wagner, I., 2008. Steps toward a typology for health informatics. In:
                           Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
                           ACM, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 515–524.
                         Becvar, L.A., Hollan, J.D., 2007. Transparency and technology appropriation: social impacts
                           of a video blogging system in dental hygiene clinical instruction. In: Proceedings of the
                           2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, Sanibel Island, FL,
                           USA, pp. 311–320.
                         Bell, G., Blythe, M., Sengers, P., 2005. Making by making strange: defamiliarization and
                           the design of domestic technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
                           12 (2), 149–173.
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275