Page 135 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 135

STRENGTH OF ANISOTROPIC ROCK MATERIAL IN TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION

                                        in which
                                                                         1 ∂ F
                                                                   A =−      dK
                                                                           ∂K
                                        where K is a hardening parameter such that yielding occurs when
                                                                    ∂ F        ∂ F
                                                                         T
                                                             dF =        {˙ }+    = 0
                                                                    ∂          ∂K
                                        The concepts of associated plastic flow were developed for perfectly plastic and
                                        strain-hardening metals using yield functions such as those of Tresca and von Mises
                                        which are independent of the hydrostatic component of stress (Hill, 1950). Although
                                        these concepts have been found to apply to some geological materials, it cannot be
                                        assumed that they will apply to pressure-sensitive materials such as rocks in which
                                        brittle fracture and dilatancy typically occur (Rudnicki and Rice, 1975).
                                          In order to obtain realistic representations of the stresses at yield in rocks and rock
                                        masses, it has been necessary to develop yield functions which are more complex than
                                        the classical functions introduced for metals. These functions are often of the form
                                        F(I 1 , J 2 ) = 0 where I 1 is the first invariant of the stress tensor and J 2 is the second
                                        invariant of the deviator stress tensor (section 2.4), i.e.
                                                            1     2  2  2
                                                       J 2 =  S + S + S
                                                            2  1   2    3
                                                                                2
                                                                     2
                                                            1
                                                                                          2
                                                          = [(  1 −   2 ) + (  2 −   3 ) + (  3 −   1 ) ]
                                                            6
                                        More complex functions also include the third invariant of the deviator stress tensor
                                        J 3 = S 1 S 2 S 3 . For example, Desai and Salami (1987) were able to obtain excellent
                                        fits to peak strength (assumed synonymous with yield) and stress–strain data for a
                                        sandstone, a granite and a dolomite using the yield function
                                                                                          m
                                                                             !        1/3  !
                                                                                     J
                                                                        n
                                                        F = J 2 −      I + I 1 2  1 −    3
                                                                       1
                                                                    n−2              J 1/2
                                                                   0                  2
                                        where  , n,   and m are material parameters and   0 is one unit of stress.
                                        4.6  Strength of anisotropic rock material in triaxial compression

                                        So far in this chapter, it has been assumed that the mechanical response of rock
                                        material is isotropic. However, because of some preferred orientation of the fabric or
                                        microstructure, or the presence of bedding or cleavage planes, the behaviour of many
                                        rocks is anisotropic. The various categories of anisotropic elasticity were discussed in
                                        section 2.10. Because of computational complexity and the difficulty of determining
                                        the necessary elastic constants, it is usual for only the simplest form of anisotropy,
                                        transverse isotropy, to be used in design analyses. Anisotropic strength criteria are
                                        also required for use in the calculations.
                                          The peak strengths developed by transversely isotropic rocks in triaxial compres-
                                        sion vary with the orientation of the plane of isotropy, foliation plane or plane of
                                        weakness, with respect to the principal stress directions. Figure 4.33 shows some
                                        117
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140