Page 79 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 79

COLLECTING STRUCTURAL DATA
























              Figure 3.15 Suggested scanline lo-
              cations along an exploration cross cut
              intersecting two orebodies in steeply
              dipping sedimentary strata.

                                           Size bias – the larger the scale of a discontinuity, the more likely it is to be sampled
                                              by a given drill core, scanline or mapping window.
                                           Truncationbias–atruncationorsizecut-offisusuallyusedinscanlineorwindow
                                              mapping. For example, fractures that are less than 50 mm in length may be
                                              ignored. Although using such a small cut-off will usually have little effect on
                                              the overall discontinuity statistics, if a comprehensive, rigorous analysis is
                                              undertaken with the aim of fully describing the distribution of discontinuity
                                              sizes then the truncation size cut-off must be taken into account. It has been
                                              found that the size cut-off can have a particular influence on estimates of
                                              fragmentation size distributions (Villaescusa, 1991).
                                           Censoring bias – this bias is associated with the artificial boundaries imposed
                                              when carrying out a rock mass characterisation exercise. Typically, in under-
                                              ground mines, the most limiting boundary is the height of the drives in which
                                              mapping is carried out. The restriction in height of the mapping window limits
                                              the trace lengths that can be observed. Censored trace lengths provide lower
                                              bound estimates of the true trace lengths.
                                          Generally there will be an orientation bias in the observed spacings between dis-
                                        continuities in a particular set because the scanline will not be perpendicular to the
                                        discontinuity traces. If, as shown in Figure 3.13, the apparent spacing between two dis-
                                        continuities in a set is x i and the acute angle between the normal to the discontinuities
                                        and the scanline is  , the true spacing in the plane of the face, x i0 , can be calculated
                                        from

                                                                    x i0 = x i cos                     (3.6)

                                                        ◦
                                          Only when   = 0 , is the true spacing in the plane of the face measured directly.
                                                                                                      ◦
                                        In the extreme case when the discontinuity and scanline are parallel (  = 90 ), no
                                        intersection will be observed. It is necessary, therefore, that scanline surveys of a face
                                        61
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84