Page 98 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 98

ROCK MASS STRUCTURE AND CHARACTERISATION

                                           Table 3.6 The effects of joint strike and dip in tunnelling (after Bieniawski, 1989).
                                                   Strike perpendicular to tunnel axis  Strike parallel to tunnel axis
                                               Drive with dip   Drive against dip
                                                                                                     ◦
                                                                                                  Dip 0 –20 ◦
                                           Dip      Dip      Dip     Dip       Dip        Dip     irrespective
                                           45 –90 ◦  20 –45 ◦  45 –90 ◦  20 –45 ◦  45 –90 ◦  20 –45 ◦  of strike
                                            ◦
                                                                                 ◦
                                                                                           ◦
                                                                      ◦
                                                     ◦
                                                              ◦
                                           very     favourable  fair  unfavourable  very   fair    fair
                                           favourable                          unfavourable
                                                   Table 3.7  Determination of rock mass rating.
                                                   Parameter              Value or description  Rating
                                                   1. strength of intact rock material  150 MPa  12
                                                   2. RQD                 70                13
                                                   3. joint spacing       0.5 m             10
                                                   4. condition of joints  slightly rough surfaces
                                                                          separation < 1mm  25
                                                                          slightly weathered joint
                                                                          wall rock
                                                   5. groundwater         water dripping    4
                                                                          Total RMR         64
                                        Table 3.5 sets out the class and description assigned to rock masses with various total
                                        ratings. The interpretation of these ratings in terms of stand-up times of underground
                                        excavations and rock mass strength parameters is given in Part (d) of Table 3.5. The
                                        variation with RMR of the in situ strengths and deformabilities of jointed rock masses
                                        will be discussed in section 4.9.
                                          As an example of the application of Bieniawski’s classification, consider a granitic
                                        rock mass for which the RMR is determined as shown in Table 3.7. An adit is to
                                        be driven into the granite oriented such that the dominant joint set strikes roughly
                                        perpendicular to the adit axis and dips at 35 against the drive direction. From Table 3.6
                                                                         ◦
                                        this situation is described as unfavourable for which a rating adjustment of – 10 is
                                        obtained from Part (b) of Table 3.5. Thus the final RMR is reduced to 54 which places
                                        the rock mass in Class III with a description of fair.


                                        3.7.3 The NGI Q system
                                        This classification was developed by Barton et al. (1974) as a means estimating
                                        support requirements for hard rock tunnels in Scandinavia as a function of an index
                                        of rock mass quality, defined as

                                                                 RQD        J r     J w

                                                           Q =          ×      ×                      (3.11)
                                                                   J n      J a    SRF
                                        where
                                          RQD is the Rock Quality Designation discussed in section 3.3;
                                          J n is the Joint Set Number which represents the number of joint sets in the rock
                                        mass, varying from 0.5 for a massive rock mass with no or few joints to 20 for crushed
                                        or diaggregated rock;
                                          J r is the Joint Roughness Number which represents the roughness of the structural
                                        features in the rock mass, varying from 0.5 for slickensided, planar surfaces to 5 for
                                        non-persistent structures with spacings larger than 3 m;
                                        80
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103