Page 88 - Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices
P. 88

CHAPTER 12


                   Risk Analysis Techniques





                   Abstract
                      Identification of hazards for risk analysis can be done using various tools. Two of the most common
                      tools are Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). In this chapter
                      three types of FMEA are discussed: DFMEA, PFMEA, and UMFMEA. Additionally, two other tools are
                      presented: Mind Map Analysis and P-Diagram. Ultimately it is the analyst's choice on how many
                      tools to use. While extra analyses consume more resources, they also reduce the likelihood of miss-
                      ing some Hazards and their causal chains.
                   Keywords: Fault Tree Analysis; FTA; Failure Modes and Effects Analysis; FMEA; DFMEA; PFMEA; UMFMEA;
                   Mind Map Analysis; P-Diagram


                   12.1 FAULT TREE ANALYSIS
                   12.1.1 Introduction
                   The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) technique was developed by Bell Labs in 1962 for use
                   on the Minuteman missile system. Later it gained wide use in civil aviation, space,
                   and military applications. MIL-HDBK-338B published in 1998 provides a reference
                   for this technique. After the 1979 incident at Three Mile Island, the Nuclear
                   Regulatory Commission expanded the use of FTA and published NUREG-0492—
                   Fault Tree Handbook in 1981. This handbook was later updated by NASA in 2002
                   with the title Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications [24].
                      FTA is a deductive top-down reasoning process that starts from the undesired sys-
                   tem outcomes and attempts to find out all the credible sequences of events that could
                   result in the undesired system outcomes. The fault tree is a graphical model that
                   depicts the logical relationships among the parallel and sequential combination of
                   events that could lead into the event at the top of the tree.
                      FTA can model both normal and fault conditions, under various environmental
                   and operational scenarios. FTA can also identify and model fault dependencies, and
                   common cause failures (CCFs).
                      Fault Trees (FTs) are constructed using logic gates, such as AND and OR gates.
                   As such, FTs lend themselves to logical simplification and reduction. Therefore there
                   is not just one correct FT to describe a system, but potentially multiple logically
                   equivalent FTs.





                   Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices                    r 2018 Elsevier Ltd.
                   DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813098-8.00012-X         All rights reserved.  67
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93