Page 92 - Safety Risk Management for Medical Devices
P. 92
Risk Analysis Techniques 71
Sufficient Do you have all the necessary events to cause the fault in question?
Benefit: Ensures the higher event can actually happen, given the cited lower-level
events.
For the purposes of risk management, we can presume that the design has already
been peer reviewed, analyzed, modeled, and tested. Therefore faults due to designer
errors can be excluded.
12.1.2.3 State of Component State of System
A fault can be a State of Component, or State of System. Ref. [24] defines “A ‘state
of component’ fault is a fault is associated uniquely with one component. A ‘state of
system’ fault is a fault not uniquely associated with one component. The immediate
cause of a ‘state of system’ fault involves more than one component.”
12.1.2.4 Common Cause Failures
CCFs describe situations where two or more component failures occur due to a com-
mon cause. In the paradigm of immediate-necessary-sufficient logic, common causes
of the failures are not explicitly modeled in the FT. Instead, common causes describe
an implicit dependency where multiple faults are triggered when the common cause
occurs. Once the CCFs are identified, they should be included in the FT to raise
awareness to their contribution.
Examples of CCF are as follows:
• Environmental factors, e.g., temperature, humidity, pressure, and vibration
• Faulty calibration
• Error in manufacturing, causing all copies of a product to be faulty
• Erroneous work instruction causing all users to operate the device incorrectly
CCFs are particularly important in redundant systems, where safety is based on the
presumption of unlikelihood of simultaneous failure of the redundant systems. In such
cases, a single cause would simultaneously defeat all of the redundant systems.
12.1.3 Symbols
FTs are constructed from logical connection of nodes. The nodes represent various
events such as a basic event, an undeveloped event, etc. The nodes are connected to
each other using logic gates. Special symbols are used to represent different types of
nodes and gates. Some of the most common symbols are presented in Fig. 12.2.
For convenience in labeling the events and gates, sometimes the style in Fig. 12.3
is used, where the descriptive text is entered in the rectangles above the FT symbol.