Page 134 - Shakespeare in the Movie From the Silent Era to Shakespeare in Love
P. 134

I Know  Not  Seems  I  123

        form,  mind you, as a stage designer would have evolved. No,  a form
        three-dimensional,  spacious,  filmworthy."  Brown argued that  with
        its  great spatial  expanses the  play Henry  V had  all but  begged to be
        filmed,  whereas Hamlet,  essentially  a one-set story,  defied  effective
        filmization.  Brown's misconception  is that  since the  camera can go
        anywhere, it  ought to; the truth is, the  camera, properly understood,
        is employed by the  director to reveal his  locale(s) as he desires us  to
        perceive it  (them).
           Films which  leap about from  place to place (westerns, spectacles,
        and  picaresques) are not  necessarily  more  inherently  "cinematic";
        they  only  qualify  as  such  if  the  director  employs  those  spaces cre-
        atively,  as is  the  case with  John Ford or D. W. Griffith.  Thus,  a one-
        set film  can be entirely  successful as long as the  director approaches
        that  single  place with  a  creative  camera.  Alfred  Hitchcock's  Rear
        Window    exemplifies  how  truly  cinematic  (and nontheatrical)  a
        single-set  movie  can be.
           Whatever  one's  complaints about this  Hamlet, its enduring impor-
        tance stems  from  the  fact  that  Olivier  often  succeeded in his  attempt
        to  search  for  ways  in  which  technical  devices  of  cinema  could
        heighten  the  impact  of a stage play, rendering the  notion  of "canned
        theater"  ever more remote. Though  his Hamlet  is, in many respects,
        aesthetic  and  soft,  there's  enough  adventurous  bouncing  about  to
        suggest  that  the  time had come to put  the  romantic  cliche  to  rest,
        reviving the  earlier,  virile  Hamlet  who  dominated  what was essen-
        tially  an Elizabethan Death  Wish.




        Hamlet,  Sturm  und  Drang
        Hamlet:   Prinz  Von Danemark
        Bavaria Attelier,  1960;  Franz  Peter  Wirth

        Swiss-born Maximilian  Schell, hailed  by many  critics  as the  Conti-
        nent's  equivalent  to  Olivier,  mounted  his  own Hamlet  onstage  in
        Munich   during the  August  festival of  1960.  Schell  modernized  the
        language ("To live or not  to live,"  he called  out;  "Get  thee to a nun-
        nery"  became  "get  thee  to  a whorehouse,"  in  keeping with  Shake-
        speare's intention);  Schell  directed  the  production  himself. William
        Glenesk,  who  visited  the  city's  music hall,  reported in  After  Dark
        that  old-guard  audiences found  Schell  too  antitraditional,  whereas
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139