Page 137 - Shakespeare in the Movie From the Silent Era to Shakespeare in Love
P. 137

126   /  Shakespeare  in the Movies

        tions  with  the  entire  country.  On  June 30  and  July  1,  seven  elec-
        tronic  Theatrofilm  cameras were assembled in the  orchestra and the
        stage's  wings,  recording three  separate performances (one  matinee,
        two evenings) from  beginning to end, with  the  audience present. One
        camera remained  close on Burton, another in medium  on Burton and
        costars,  a  third  for  long  shots,  etc.  This  recording,  akin  to  a TV
        image,  was fed to  a truck  outside  the  theater,  where a new process
        called  Electronovision  allowed  for  immediate  transference to  35-
        millimeter  film.  The  three  recordings were  quickly  edited  into  a
        single print.  A thousand  prints were struck by Warner Bros.,  and in
        late  September, Hamlet  was  shown  four  times  (two  matinees,  two
        evenings)  at  theaters  nationwide  for one-fourth  of what  people  had
        paid to  see the  show  on Broadway.
           The  intended  effect,  as Robert Koehler later  reflected in  the  Los
        Angeles  Times,  was "to  create the illusion of putting moviegoers in
        a  seat  at  the  Lunt-Fontanne."  The  experiment  did  not  work. As
        critic Bob Thomas  noted,  "With  normal stage lighting,  the  sets were
        murky   much   of  the  time,  the  actors  [voices] often  indistinct."
        Leonard Harris added: "Apparently unsure whether  he wanted to try
        movie techniques  or merely record the  stage play, Bill Colleran,  the
        film  director,  tried  a  bit  of  each  and  ended  up  with  an  unhappy
        medium"   that  even provincial  audiences sensed was neither  fish  nor
        fowl.  Rather than  a happy blend of the  two, this proved a sorry bas-
        tard  form.
           The  film  did rate as a commercial  success. With the  $1.1 million
        cost  returning  grosses of $6.5 million,  Hollywood briefly hoped  the
        technique  might  provide a new  source of revenue while  at  the  same
        time  raising the  nation's  level  of theater  sophistication.  In fact,  most
        ticket  buyers had been attracted by the novelty (much like the  brief-
        lived 3-D  phenomenom  of the  mid-fifties)  and by Burton's  box-office
        appeal.  One year later,  an  attempt  to  similarly  share  Olivier's  Oth-
        ello  (see chapter  9  for  details)  did  less  business;  a  third,  of  the
        Anthony  Newley-Lesley   Bricusse musical  Stop  The  World—I  Want
        to Get  Off!,  bombed. The  concept would not  take hold until, a quar-
        ter century later, pay-per-view allowed the public to see such broad-
        casts  in  the  privacy of their  homes  (and often  live,  which  added  to
        the  impact). The  smaller  TV screen  proved more  conducive  to  such
        a concept,  since  a huge theatrical  image blew already larger than  life
        stage performances out  of proportion.
           Whatever its aesthetic failings,  the production had a major  impact
        on  the  public's  perception of Hamlet.  Millions  of people saw  a per-
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142