Page 128 - Shale Shakers Drilling Fluid Systems
P. 128

SHAKER APPLICATIONS  111



        rigs. The cost of handling discarded material may     still remains only one component of a complete
        require drying the discard. The fine mesh screens     drilled solids removal system (see Chapter 7).
        discharge much wetter solids than those discarded        A system of cascading shale shakers is de-
        from very coarse screens (see Chapter 13).            signed to use one set of screens (or shakers) to
                                                              scalp large solids and gumbo from the drilling
                                                              fluid, and another set of lower screens (or shak-
                    CASCADE SYSTEMS                           ers) to receive the upper shaker underflow fluid for
                                                              removal of fine solids. This combination increases
           The first cascade system was introduced to         the solids removal efficiency of high performance
        the drilling industry in the mid-1970s. A scalper     shakers, especially during fast, top-hole drilling or
        shaker received fluid from the flow line and re-      in gumbo-producing formations. The cascade sys-
        moved gumbo, or large drilled solids, before the      tem is used where the solids' loading exceeds the
        fluid passed through the main shaker using a fine     capacity of the fine mesh screen. The advantages
        mesh screen (at this time, 80- to 120-mesh screens    of this cascade arrangement include:
        were the practical limits). The first unit combined
        a single-deck, elliptical motion shaker mounted di-      1. Higher overall solids loading on the system
        rectly over a double-deck, circular motion shaker        2. Reduced solids loading on fine mesh screens
        (Figure 4-1). This combination was especially suc-       3. Finer screen separations
        cessful offshore where space is limited.                 4. Longer screen life
           One advantage of multiple-deck shale shakers is       5. Lower fluid well costs
        their ability to reduce solids loading on the lower,    There are three basic designs of cascade shaker
        fine mesh screen deck. This increases both shaker     systems:
        capacity and screen life. However, capacity may still
        be exceeded under many drilling conditions. The          1. The separate unit concept
        screen mesh and, thus, the size solids returned to       2. The integral unit with multiple vibratory
        the active system, is often increased to prevent loss      motions
        of whole mud over the end of the shaker screens.         3. The integral unit with a single vibratory
           Processing drilling fluid through shale shaker          motion
        screens, centrifugal pumps, hydrocyclones, and
        drill bit nozzles can cause degradation of solids     The choice of which design to use depends on
        and aggravated problems associated with fine sol-     many factors, including space limitations, perfor-
        ids in the drilling fluid. To remove drilled solids as  mance objectives, and overall cost.
        soon as possible, additional shakers are installed
        at the flow line—sometimes, as many as six to ten     Separate Unit
        parallel shakers—so that the finest mesh screen
        may be used. With the finer mesh screens and            The separate unit system mounts usable rig
        additional shakers in place, downstream equip-        shakers (elliptical or circular motion) on stands
        ment is often erroneously eliminated. It is impor-    above newly installed linear motion shakers (Fig-
        tant to remember that the improved shale shaker       ure 4-2). Fluid from the rig shakers (or scalping
                                                              shakers) is routed to the possum belly (back tank)























                          FIGURE 4-1                                            FIGURE 4-2
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133