Page 106 - Silence in Intercultural Communication
P. 106

Chapter 4.  Perceptions of silence   93



             4.4.2  Norms of relevance

             As discussed earlier, Japanese students seem to have stricter criteria than Austra-
             lian students for the relevance of comments in discussions and the appropriacy of
             questions for lecturers, and they consequently perceive a higher risk of face-loss
             in volunteering participation than do their Australian counterparts. A comment
             by a Japanese student below illustrates this point:

             (45)   M8:   But when you cannot finish the reading assignment, you would rather
                             not ask questions, I think.
                     I:      Right. I wouldn’t-
                     M8:   If you ask about what is written there [as an answer], it is rude. Not even
                             embarrassing but rude, don’t you think? [13:56-58 M8]

             This student (M8) also complained that in one class, a peer student asked why a
             certain technical term was used, even though it was clearly defined in the reading
             material. He was not happy about the fact that the lecturer took time and effort to
             answer the question. He went on to say:

             (46)   Also, at times when you cannot understand something, well I think it’s rather
                     psychological, but when you cannot understand, how can I put it, well, it’s not
                     really anybody’s fault, but whether you think you are not good enough or
                     something else, you know, it’s definitely a difference, I think. If it’s me, if
                     I didn’t know something, even though I wouldn’t think it’s bad, but I would
                     think I should have covered that area myself. But other people probably tend
                     to .... ask the lecturer if they don’t understand. [13:62-66 M8]

             These comments take us back to the socio-psychological aspect of participation
             which holds Japanese students back from participation. If Japanese students have
             stricter criteria for relevance, there is more chance of risking loss of face when
             they participate.
                Fear of producing irrelevant or inappropriate speech in class does not seem
             to be the only relevance-related trigger for silence. Irrelevant speech by other
             students also seems to affect Japanese student participation. There are instances
             where Japanese students seem to ‘switch off’ and choose to stop engaging in dis-
             cussions  when  irrelevance  is  perceived.  The  following  exchange  from  a  focus
             group interview illustrates this:

             (47)   M2:   I think it is possible that Asian students just give up if they find it
                             [discussion] pointless.
                     F8:    Often it’s not because of lack of understanding but because of lack of
                             attention. [23:248-249 M2&F8]
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111