Page 125 - Silence in Intercultural Communication
P. 125

112  Silence in Intercultural Communication


             Table 5.5  Number and length of turns in Intercultural Communication
             (Regular Discussion: Total)
             Participant  No. of classes  Total number  Total turn   Average no. of  Average turn-
                       included   of turns    length    turns per class  length
             Miki      3          7           98        2.3         14.0
             Sophia    4          33          378       8.3         11.5
             Molly     5          80          577       16.0        7.2
             Bill      4          56          339       14.0        6.1
             Tony      4          7           138       1.8         19.7
             Average                                    8.5         11.7


             Table 5.6  Number and total lengths of turns in Intercultural Communication
             (Presentation Discussion: Total)

             Participant     Number of turns  Total turn length  Average turn length
             Miki 1st pres.  16               64.5             4.0
             Miki 2nd pres.  9                171              19
             Miki Average    12.5             117.8            9.4
             Bill            18               153              8.5
             Tony            8                61               7.6
             Average         12.8             112.4            9.8


             Looking at patterns of participation among the students in the sample group, we
             can see that in discussions after others’ presentations (hereafter Regular Discus-
             sion), Miki speaks much less frequently than other students, with the exception
             of Tony, as shown in Table 5.5.
                In discussions after her own presentations (hereafter Presentation Discus-
             sion), Miki spoke with greater frequency. Table 5.6 shows the total number and
             length of turns of three participants from the sample group.
                Comparing participation in the two different situations, Miki had an average
             of 12.5 turns after her presentations, while her average turn number in Regular
             Discussion was 2.3. Tony, who took the least turns per class (1.8 turns) in Regu-
             lar Discussion, also spoke with greater frequency in Presentation Discussion (8
             turns). As for Bill, he was one of the most active participants in the group, and the
             results show that he made a substantial contribution to class discussions in both
             Regular and Presentation Discussions. Indeed, Bill was described by Dr. Telfer as
             being among those students who “don’t need encouragement” to participate. Dr.
             Telfer in fact mentioned that all the local Australian students seemed confident
             in this class.
                On the other hand, Miki was perceived as one of the “two [students] that
             spoke the least” by Dr. Telfer, and as “reticent” by Bill. This suggests that Miki’s
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130