Page 246 - Six Sigma Demystified
P. 246

226        Six SigMa  DemystifieD


                          If you have a strong suspicion that the blocking factor would interact with
                        another factor, you might be able to include it as a main factor. In the cookie
                        baking example, you could treat each oven cycle as a single run of the experi-
                        ment and vary the temperature, time, and ingredients for each oven cycle. In
                        this  way,  you  could  estimate  interactions  among  temperature,  time,  and
                        ingredients.
                          There are other factors, sometimes called casual factors, that may have an
                        impact on your experimental response, such as temperature, humidity, time of
                        day, and so on. If you think that these factors are truly important, you should
                        make them controllable factors for the experiment. If you can’t, or you choose
                        not to because it would increase the size or cost of the experiment, you should
                        at least measure them. You then can estimate if they are correlated with the
                        response, which would suggest the need for additional experimental runs to
                        analyze their effect.

                        Defining Factor Levels
                        For each factor, you must define specific levels at which to run the experimen-
                        tal conditions.
                          Factors may be either quantitative (measured) or qualitative (categorical).
                        The qualitative factor categories are converted to coded units (such as –1 and
                        +1) for regression analysis.
                          Qualitative factor levels may be inherent to the process or product under
                        investigation. For example, you may have three product configurations, or you
                        may be interested in the variation among four machining centers.
                          For quantitative factors, if you expect the response to be nonlinear with
                        respect to the factor, you need at least three levels for that factor. Nonlinear

                        effects are not addressed in initial experiments but instead are left until you can
                        optimize in the improve stage. Earlier experiments will be used to screen out
                        insignificant factors, which can be done with only two levels per factor. Bear in
                        mind that more levels lead to more experimental runs. In addition, software
                        used for generating designs may limit the design choices when there are mixed
                        levels for the factors.
                          When you define the levels for each factor, you want to span the region of
                        interest. It’s helpful to think of the expected variation you are likely to see for
                        the factor during normal operations, but sometimes this results in factor levels
                        being too close to measure an effect. For example, if you think that temperature
                        typically only varies from 70 to 80 degrees, you may not see much of an effect
                        owing to temperature over that 10-degree difference. It’s usually better to think
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251