Page 32 - Six Sigma Demystified
P. 32

Chapter 1  d e p loy m e n t   s t r at e g y        13


                           hats,” usually because each function can’t be  cost- justified as a  full- time posi-
                           tion. Furthermore, many of these functions include tasks that are critical to the
                           daily operations, not just the  longer- term survival of the firm. Managers may
                           question how they can afford to “lose” key people to the black belt role.
                             The key to resource allocation is the realization that the Six Sigma program
                           will very quickly pay for itself. When the huge amount of waste in a 3s organi-
                           zation (25 percent of revenue) is considered, it’s clear that there are tremen-
                           dous opportunities for these organizations. Many of these opportunities exist
                           simply because of resource constraints: People know the problem exists, have a
                           good understanding of potential solutions, yet lack the time to investigate and
                           deploy the best solution. Only by diverting or adding resources to the system
                           can waste be reduced and profitability improved. The deployment plan should
                           balance expenditures for training and project deployment with the achievable
                           savings predicted in the coming one to three years.
                             A mature Six Sigma program usually has about 1 percent of its workforce
                           committed as black belts. Once trained properly, these individuals work only
                           on black belt projects. In this regard, they are strictly overhead and contribute
                           nothing directly to the everyday operations.
                             Full- time black belts will lead four to seven project teams per year. Each
                           team consists of green belts, line personnel, and  subject- matter experts involved
                           in the process targeted for improvement. These team members maintain their
                           operational roles in the organization and participate only when serving on a
                           project team. Team facilitators are also sometimes needed to help manage
                           group dynamics and build consensus.
                             In some organizations, green belts are also designated as project leaders,
                           responsible for completing one to five projects per year. Since this can present

                           conflicts with their daily operational duties, a preferred strategy is for  full- time
                           black belts to lead projects. In Chapter 2 we will also discuss the limitations of
                           the green belt’s expertise as an issue with project leadership.
                             Master black belts provide coaching and other expertise to black belts. They
                           typically have expertise in advanced statistical analysis methods and change
                           management. One master black belt for every 10 black belts is the recom-
                           mended staffing. In addition, it is useful to appoint a master black belt to assist
                           the executive staff with Six Sigma deployment, technical training development,
                           and technical support for  business- level Six Sigma projects.
                             Smaller companies may have floating black belts who provide expertise to a
                           number of Six Sigma teams throughout the organization. Companies with less
                           than a few hundred employees may use key support personnel in  part- time
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37