Page 42 - Six Sigma for electronics design and manufacturing
P. 42

The Nature of Six Sigma and Its Connectivity to Other Quality Tools
                                                    Matrix
                                                  Correlation
                                Strong Relationship = 5
                                Medium  Relationship = 3
                                                    Product
                                Weak Relationship = 1
                                                 Characteristics
                                                              M
                                                              P I               13
                                   Customer       Relationship  O  Competitive
                                                              R
                                    Needs           Matrix    T   Analysis
                                                              A
                                                              N
                                                              C
                                                              E
                                                    Product
                                                  Specifications
                                      Figure 1.2 QFD product planning matrix.
                         The relation between the customer needs and the product charac-
                        teristics  can  be  considered  by  the  QFD  team  as  having  one  of  four
                        states: strong, medium, weak, or none. Each customer need is given
                        an importance ranking, and that ranking is multiplied by the rela-
                        tionship to generate a total score for each of the product design char-
                        acteristics.  In  some  cases,  the  importance  ranking  could  further  be
                        modified by the marketing emphasis on that customer need. For ex-
                        ample, lighter weight of a product might be considered an important
                        customer need, and customer feedback indicated it should be ranked
                        as medium in importance, for a value of 5. Marketing managers might
                        decide that the new product could compete better if they could empha-
                        size this attribute as a sales point. The importance level could be mul-
                        tiplied by a factor of two, increasing its value to 10. In this manner,
                        the design of the product is forced to be of lighter weight than would
                        otherwise be indicated by the customer’s wishes.
                         A high characteristic total score indicates that the design character-
                        istic is important and the related specification should be enhanced, ei-
                        ther in the positive or negative direction, depending on the direction
                        of “goodness” of the specification. A low score indicates that the speci-
                        fication of the current product design is adequate, and should be left
                        alone or even widened or decreased in value. In this manner, QFD
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47