Page 227 - Soil and water contamination, 2nd edition
P. 227

214                                                  Soil and Water Contamination


                      0
                                         C/CC/C
                                         C/C  = 1.0
                                             = 1.0
                                             = 1.0
                                           0 0 0
                      5
                      10
                      15
                     Depth
                      20

                      25
                                                                          C/C  = 0.5
                      30                                                    0

                     6642  6642  6642  35
                       0        50        100      150       200       250      300       350
                                                   Horizontal distance
                    Figure 11.10  Downstream propagation of a continuous input into groundwater due to advection  and longitudinal
                    and transverse dispersion.



                    on a wealth of laboratory and field experiments reported in Fischer et al. (1979), the average
                    transverse turbulent diffusion  coefficient in a uniform river channel can be estimated by:

                    D     . 0  15 H  u                                                (11.38)
                      y         *
                    where H is the river depth [L] and u  is the shear velocity  (=  gHS ; see Equation 11.34)
                                                 *
                        -1
                    [L T ]. The experiments indicate that the width of the river channel plays some role in
                    transverse mixing. However, it is unclear how that effect should be incorporated (Fischer
                    et al., 1979). In natural streams, transverse mixing deviates from the behaviour in Equation
                    (11.20) primarily due to large helicoidal motions, which are not properties of the turbulent
                    diffusion . Moreover, the cross-section is rarely of uniform depth and the river slope varies.
                    These effects enhance transverse mixing, and for natural streams the transverse dispersion
                    coefficient can be estimated by:

                    D     6 . 0  H  u                                                 (11.39)
                      y        *
                    If the stream is slowly meandering and the irregularities in the river banks are moderate, the
                    empirical coefficient of 0.6 in Equation (11.39) usually varies in the range from 0.4 to 0.8
                    (Fischer et al., 1979).
                       The mixing length , i.e. the distance over which the substance is considered to be fully
                    mixed over the river cross-section, can be estimated by employing the advection –dispersion
                    equation and its associated Gaussian  distribution solution.  The order of magnitude of
                    the distance from a single point source  to the zone of complete transverse mixing can be

                    approximated by equating the lateral standard deviation  σ of the substance’s transverse
                    concentration distribution to the width of the river:
                        2 D  t  B                                                     (11.40)
                           y









                                                                                            10/1/2013   6:44:59 PM
        Soil and Water.indd   226                                                           10/1/2013   6:44:59 PM
        Soil and Water.indd   226
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232