Page 473 - Solid Waste Analysis and Minimization a Systems Approach
P. 473

CASE STUDY      451



                    the company could significantly reduce both the amount of material going to the land-
                    fill as well as disposal costs. The following sections provide alternatives for dealing
                    with the recyclable materials not currently recycled.  The nine major dock waste
                    streams are mentioned in Table 35.2.
                      Of the major waste streams, wood pallets constituted the largest opportunity to
                    increase recycling rates. The company generated over 420, 000 lb of wood from their
                    operations on an annual basis. Figure 35.2 is a picture of these pallets. This wood
                    waste results from damaged and unnecessary pallets as well as damaged or carelessly
                    disposed of wood blocking, which is used to secure freight in trailer-loading opera-
                    tions. Wood is both reusable and recyclable and should be handled in such a way that
                    it is beneficial to both the company and the environment. In order to reduce the
                    frequency of disposal of the wood hopper, the company examined the possibility of a
                    precrusher grinding unit to reduce the wasted volume in the disposal container. A cost
                    analysis of this machine indicated that it would save the company $14,000 per year
                    with a payback period of 1.3 years.
                      The plastic wrap used in the freight-loading and unloading process is potentially
                    recyclable. The company disposed of approximately 33 tons of plastic wrap per year.
                    By instituting a collection program for plastic material, the company would enjoy a
                    twofold benefit. First, the plastic material would be removed from the disposal stream,
                    therefore reducing compactor volumes, frequency of disposal, and hence, disposal
                    costs. The second benefit involves the collection of revenue for the film plastic. By
                    recycling the film plastic generated in the dock area, the company had the potential to
                    generate revenues up to $1500.
                      Over 56,000 lb of corrugated cardboard were generated yearly.  The corrugated
                    cardboard serves the same function as the boxboard throughout dock operations,






                     TABLE 35.2      WASTE HANDLING OPTIONS FOR THE NINE MAJOR DOCK
                     WASTE STREAMS

                     WASTE                     AMOUNT GENERATED             WASTE HANDLING
                     STREAM                    (LB/YEAR)                    OPTIONS

                     Boxboard                         25,165                Recycling
                     Film plastic                     57,752                Recycling

                     Metal banding                    65,773                Recycling
                     OCC                              57,909                Recycling

                     Paper                            26,767                Recycling/source reduction
                     Paper cups                       27,453                Source reduction

                     Tape                             14,298                Source reduction
                     Wood                            420,375                Recycling

                     Miscellaneous                    22,306                Source reduction
   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478