Page 144 - Sport Culture and the Media
P. 144

TAKING US THROUGH IT ||  125


                         ‘signing them up’ as on the same  ‘team’. This well-established theoretical
                         notion of  ‘interpellation’  – what Althusser (1971) calls  ‘hailing’ subjects in
                         much the same way as people in the street automatically turn around when
                         someone calls out ‘Hey, you!’ (appropriately here we might add the line from
                         the Madness song One Step Beyond, ‘Don’t watch dat! Watch dis!’) – is more
                         than a matter of technical communication. It is also a question of ideology. If
                         media sports texts have the power to unite, temporarily or in the long term,
                         symbolically or materially, disparate audiences into relatively coherent groups
                         of patriots or consumers, then they are potentially deliverable, as Golding and
                         Murdock (1991: 17) noted in Chapter 3, to those who wish to  ‘sustain and
                         support prevailing relations of domination’. For example, the patriotic fervour
                         generated by Argentina’s winning of the soccer World Cup in 1978 (at least
                         temporarily) assisted the fortunes of the oppressive military  junta whose
                         slogan was ‘25 Million Argentinians Will Play in the World Cup’ (quoted in
                         Kuper 1994: 174). From the mouths of sports commentators can come social
                         ideologies in the guise of innocently hysterical descriptions of play.



                         Ideologies and Olympic extravaganzas

                         Live sports broadcasts (over which, of course, commentators exert only partial
                         control; see Chapter 6) do not have to be rampantly xenophobic to be the
                         bearers of ideology. Gordon and Sibson (1998), for example, note how the
                         absence of commentary on some of the smaller and more marginal national
                         teams during the television broadcast of the opening ceremony of the 1996
                         Atlanta Summer Olympics had the effect of further marginalizing those
                         nations. Tomlinson (1996), similarly, in his analysis of the commentary at
                         Olympic opening ceremonies, argues that at the 1984 Los Angeles Summer
                         Olympics, the aforementioned (and much lampooned) BBC commentator
                         David Coleman’s:
                           welcome to the Coliseum mixed history, myth and politics: ‘in the sun-
                           shine of this Californian afternoon, ancient Greek rites, Hollywood
                           fantasy and the reality of life in 1984 will  find common ground. . .’
                           (Transcription from BBC broadcast). There were more nations and more
                           competitors than ever before at LA (despite Soviet bloc boycotts), wel-
                           comed by a showbiz style of ‘pure Hollywood extravaganza on a gigantic
                           scale’, as Coleman put it. ‘The show must go on’.
                                                                      (Tomlinson 1996: 590)
                           In hosting on behalf of a national television audience a ceremony which,
                         during the 1992 Barcelona Summer Olympics, Coleman described as being
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149