Page 314 - Standard Handbook Petroleum Natural Gas Engineering VOLUME2
P. 314

Fluid Movement in Waterflooded Reservoirs   281


                 Areal  or  Pattern Sweep Efficiency (E,)

                   Areal sweep efficiency of  an oil recovery process depends primarily on two
                 factors: the flooding pattern  and the mobilities of  the fluids in the reservoir.
                 In  the  early work  on  sweep efficiency and injectivity, Muskat and coworkers
                 [25,280] presented analytical solutions for direct line drive, staggered line drive,
                 hpot, ?spot, and $spot  patterns (patterns were discussed earlier; see Figure 5150).
                 Experimental studies on the effect of  mobility ratio for different patterns were
                 presented by  Dyes,  Caudle, and Erickson [281] (5-spot and line drives); Craig,
                 Geffen,  and  Morse  [282], Prats  et al.  [283], Caudle  and Witte  [284], and
                 Haberman [285] (5-spot); and Kimbler, Caudle, and Cooper [286] (9-spot). The
                 effect of  sweepout beyond the pattern area was studied as well [287,288]. From
                 a mathematical study the breakthrough sweep efficiency of  the staggered line
                 drive was presented by  Prats [289]. A comparison of the areal sweep efficiency
                 and the ratio d/a  is shown in Figure 5-159 for direct and staggered line drives
                 [25,289], and a review of  the early work  was  provided by  Crawford [290].
                   Areal sweep efficiency at breakthrough for a 5-spot pattern is shown in Figure
                 5-160, and the effect of mobility ratio on areal sweep is shown in Figure 5-161.
                 These figures show that areal sweep efficiency is low when mobility ratio is high
                 (note that the data in Figure 5-161 from Dyes, Caudle and Erickson are plotted
                 in terms of  the reciprocal of  mobility ratio as currently defined). Areal sweep
                 efficiencies at breakthrough, for different patterns and a mobility ratio of one,
                 are summarized in Table 5-39 [133,277,279].
                   Areal  sweep  efficiency  is  more  important  for  considering rate  vs.  time
                 behavior of a waterflood rather than ultimate recovery because, at the economic
                 limit, most of  the interval flooded has either had enough water throughput to
                 provide 100% areal sweep or the water bank has not yet reached the producing
                 well  so  that no correction is needed for areal sweep [133].
                   When  waterflooding calculations are performed, especially with  computers
                 or programmable calculators, the use of  equations with adjustable coefficients

                     1.0      I     I     I     I     I    I     I     I
                 z                                                           I
                 0
                 z                                                                -
                 W  0.8  -
                 -
                 -
                 0
                 k  0.6 -                                                         -
                 W
                 n
                 5 0.4  -                                                         -
                 3                          I  Direct  Line  Drive - Muskat
                 in     -                  2  Staggered  Line  Drive-  Muskat
                    0.2                                                           -
                 J                         3 Staggered  Line  Drive - Prats
                 a
                 W
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319