Page 332 - Standard Handbook Petroleum Natural Gas Engineering VOLUME2
P. 332

Fluid Movement in Waterflooded Reservoirs   499








                  W
                  I
                  I-
                  x
                    40-
                  W
                  a
                  T3
                  2
                  W
                    304000










                                   CUMULATIVE  WmR  INJECTED  FROM  8-17-81,  bbl
                                       Figure 5-172.  Hall plot [315].

                  should be used if permeability capacity, or transmissibility changes, are desired
                  [315]. If  the difference between reservoir pressure and the hydrostatic head is
                  more than  15% of the wellhead pressure, serious quantitative errors can result
                  when  wellhead pressures are used  in  the  construction  of Hall  plots;  if  the
                  difference is less than  15%, only slight errors are caused [66].
                    Earlougher has presented a modified version of  the Hall technique in which
                  the slope, m',  is  defined as [66]:


                                                                               (5-237)


                  The improvement in overall flow efficiency, E,,  can be obtained from [66]:

                     E,after  -m'before   =-   Iafter
                             -
                    E,before   m'after   Ibefore                               (5-238)

                  where the injectivity index, I, or Hall slopes are calculated using the pressure
                  difference between the flowing bottomhole pressure and the formation pressure.
                  Production Curves. Plots of waterflood injection and production performance
                  can be  presented  in  a number of  ways.  For  the history of the  project, water
                  injection rate, oil production rate, and water4 ratio or water cut can be plotted
                  vs. time (usually months). The actual water injection and oil production rates
                  can be compared to the predicted rates on a time basis.
   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337