Page 108 -
P. 108

74    PART 2 • STRATEGY FORMULATION


                                         Unilever recently sued Procter & Gamble (P&G) over that company’s corporate-
                                      espionage activities to obtain the secrets of its Unilever hair-care business. After spending
                                      $3 million to establish a team to find out about competitors in the domestic hair-care indus-
                                      try, P&G allegedly took roughly 80 documents from garbage bins outside Unilever’s
                                      Chicago offices. P&G produces Pantene and Head & Shoulders shampoos; Unilever has
                                      hair-care brands such as ThermaSilk, Suave, Salon Selectives, and Finesse. Similarly,
                                      Oracle Corp. recently admitted that detectives it hired paid janitors to go through
                                      Microsoft Corp.’s garbage, looking for evidence to use in court.

                                      Market Commonality and Resource Similarity
                                      By definition, competitors are firms that offer similar products and services in the same
                                      market. Markets can be geographic or product areas or segments. For example, in the
                                      insurance industry the markets are broken down into commercial/consumer, health/life, or
                                      Europe/Asia. Researchers use the terms market commonality and resource similarity to
                                      study rivalry among competitors. Market commonality can be defined as the number and
                                      significance of markets that a firm competes in with rivals. 11  Resource similarity is the
                                      extent to which the type and amount of a firm’s internal resources are comparable to a
                                      rival. 12  One way to analyze competitiveness between two or among several firms is to
                                      investigate market commonality and resource similarity issues while looking for areas of
                                      potential competitive advantage along each firm’s value chain.


                                      Competitive Analysis: Porter’s Five-Forces Model

                                      As illustrated in Figure 3-3, Porter’s Five-Forces Model of competitive analysis is a widely
                                      used approach for developing strategies in many industries. The intensity of competition
                                      among firms varies widely across industries. Table 3-10 reveals the average profit margin
                                      and return on investment for firms in different industries. Note the substantial variation
                                      among industries. For example, the range in profit margin goes from 0 to 18 for food pro-
                                      duction to computer software, respectively. Intensity of competition is highest in lower-
                                      return industries. The collective impact of competitive forces is so brutal in some industries
                                      that the market is clearly “unattractive” from a profit-making standpoint. Rivalry among
                                      existing firms is severe, new rivals can enter the industry with relative ease, and both suppli-
                                      ers and customers can exercise considerable bargaining leverage. According to Porter, the
                                      nature of competitiveness in a given industry can be viewed as a composite of five forces:
                                      1.  Rivalry among competing firms
                                      2.  Potential entry of new competitors


            FIGURE 3-3
            The Five-Forces Model of Competition


                                           Potential development of substitute products






                                                  Rivalry among competing
                Bargaining power of suppliers                                   Bargaining power of consumers
                                                         firms




                                              Potential entry of new competitors
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113