Page 338 -
P. 338

304    PART 4 • STRATEGY EVALUATION


           Issues for Review and Discussion


            1.  Discuss the nature and implications of the upcoming accounting switch from GAAP to IFRS
                in the United States.
            2.  Ask an accounting professor at your college or university the following question and report
                back to the class: “To what extent would my learning the IFRS standards on my own give me
                competitive advantage in the job market?”
            3.  Give an example of “consonance” other than the one provided by Rumelt in the chapter.
            4.  Evaluating strategies on a continuous rather than a periodic basis is desired. Discuss the pros
                and cons of this statement.
            5.  How often should an organization’s vision/mission be changed in light of strategy evaluation
                activities?
            6.  Compare Mintzberg’s notion of “crafting” strategies with this textbook’s notion of “gathering
                and assimilating information” to formulate strategies.
            7.  Why has strategy evaluation become so important in business today?
            8.  BellSouth Services is considering putting divisional EFE and IFE matrices online for
                continual updating. How would this affect strategy evaluation?
            9.  What types of quantitative and qualitative criteria do you think Ellen Kullman, CEO of
                DuPont, uses to evaluate the company’s strategy?
           10.  As owner of a local, independent supermarket, explain how you would evaluate the firm’s
                strategy.
           11.  Under what conditions are corrective actions not required in the strategy-evaluation
                process?
           12.  Identify types of organizations that may need to evaluate strategy more frequently than
                others. Justify your choices.
           13.  As executive director of the state forestry commission, in what way and how frequently
                would you evaluate the organization’s strategies?
           14.  Identify some key financial ratios that would be important in evaluating a bank’s
                strategy.
           15.  As owner of a chain of hardware stores, describe how you would approach contingency
                planning.
           16.  Strategy evaluation allows an organization to take a proactive stance toward shaping its own
                future. Discuss the meaning of this statement.
           17.  Explain and discuss the Balanced Scorecard.
           18.  Why is the Balanced Scorecard an important topic both in devising objectives and in
                evaluating strategies?
           19.  Develop a Balanced Scorecard for a local fast-food restaurant.
           20.  Do you believe strategic management should be more visible or hidden as a process in a
                firm? Explain.
           21.  Do you feel strategic management should be more a top-down or bottom-up process in a
                firm? Explain.
           22.  Do you believe strategic management is more an art or a science? Explain.





           Notes

            1.  Dale McConkey, “Planning in a Changing Environment,”  7.  D. Hussey and M. Langham, Corporate Planning: The
                Business Horizons (September–October 1988): 64.    Human Factor (Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1979):
            2.  Robert Simons, “Control in an Age of Empowerment,”  138.
                Harvard Business Review (March–April 1995): 80.  8.  Carter Bayles, “Strategic Control: The President’s
            3.  Dale Zand, “Reviewing the Policy Process,” California  Paradox,” Business Horizons 20, no. 4 (August 1977): 18.
                Management Review 21, no. 1 (Fall 1978): 37.   9.  Adam Lashinsky, “The World’s Most Admired
            4.  Eccles. 3: 1–8.                                    Companies,” Fortune (March 16, 2009): 81–91.
            5.  Claude George Jr., The History of Management Thought  10.  Robert Waterman, Jr., “How the Best Get Better,”
                (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1968):  BusinessWeek (September 14, 1987): 105.
                165–166.                                      11.  Robert Linneman and Rajan Chandran, “Contingency
            6.  M. Erez and F. Kanfer, “The Role of Goal Acceptance in  Planning: A Key to Swift Managerial Action in the
                Goal Setting and Task Performance,” Academy of     Uncertain Tomorrow,” Managerial Planning 29,
                Management Review 8, no. 3 (July 1983): 457.       no. 4 (January–February 1981): 23–27.
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343