Page 350 -
P. 350

316    PART 5 • KEY STRATEGIC-MANAGEMENT TOPICS


                                      9.  Union Pacific
                                      10.  Fortune Brands 8
                                         From a social responsibility perspective, these were the least admired companies
                                      in 2009:
                                      1.  Circuit City Stores
                                      2.  Family Dollar Stores
                                      3.  Dillard’s
                                      4.  Sears Holdings
                                      5.  Tribune
                                      6.  Hon Hai Precision Industry
                                      7.  Fiat
                                      8.  PEMEX
                                      9.  Surgutneftegas
                                      10.  Huawei Technologies 9

                                         Firms should strive to engage in social activities that have economic benefits. Merck &
                                      Co. once developed the drug ivermectin for treating river blindness, a disease caused by a
                                      fly-borne parasitic worm endemic in poor tropical areas of Africa, the Middle East, and
                                      Latin America. In an unprecedented gesture that reflected its corporate commitment to
                                      social responsibility, Merck then made ivermectin available at no cost to medical personnel
                                      throughout the world. Merck’s action highlights the dilemma of orphan drugs, which offer
                                      pharmaceutical companies no economic incentive for profitable development and distribu-
                                      tion. Merck did however garner substantial goodwill among its stakeholders for its actions.

                                      Social Policies on Retirement
                                      Some countries around the world are facing severe workforce shortages associated with
                                      their aging populations. The percentage of persons age 65 or older exceeds 20 percent in
                                      Japan, Italy, and Germany—and will reach 20 percent in 2018 in France. In 2036, the
                                      percentage of persons age 65 or older will reach 20 percent in the United States and China.
                                      Unlike the United States, Japan is reluctant to rely on large-scale immigration to bolster its
                                      workforce. Instead, Japan provides incentives for its elderly to work until ages 65 to 75.
                                      Western European countries are doing the opposite, providing incentives for its elderly to
                                      retire at ages 55 to 60. The International Labor Organization says 71 percent of Japanese
                                      men ages 60 to 64 work, compared to 57 percent of American men and just 17 percent of
                                      French men in the same age group.
                                         Sachiko Ichioka, a typical 67-year-old man in Japan, says, “I want to work as long as
                                      I’m healthy. The extra money means I can go on trips, and I’m not a burden on my chil-
                                      dren.” Better diet and health care have raised Japan’s life expectancy now to 82, the highest
                                      in the world. Japanese women are having on average only 1.28 children compared to 2.04 in
                                      the United States. Keeping the elderly at work, coupled with reversing the old-fashioned
                                      trend of keeping women at home, are Japan’s two key remedies for sustaining its workforce
                                      in factories and businesses. This prescription for dealing with problems associated with an
                                      aging society should be considered by many countries around the world. The Japanese
                                      government is phasing in a shift from age 60 to age 65 as the date when a person may begin
                                      receiving a pension, and premiums paid by Japanese employees are rising while payouts are
                                      falling. Unlike the United States, Japan has no law against discrimination based on age.
                                         Japan’s huge national debt, 175 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) compared to
                                      65 percent for the United States, is difficult to lower with a falling population because
                                      Japan has fewer taxpaying workers. Worker productivity increases in Japan are not able to
                                      offset declines in number of workers, thus resulting in a decline in overall economic pro-
                                      duction. Like many countries, Japan does not view immigration as a good way to solve this
                                      problem.
                                         Japan’s shrinking workforce has become such a concern that the government just
                                      recently allowed an unspecified number of Indonesian and Filipino nurses and caregivers
                                      to work in Japan for two years. The number of working-age Japanese—those between ages
                                      15 and 64—is projected to shrink to 70 million by 2030, from 82 million in 2009. Using
   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355