Page 139 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 139

JENNIFER DARYL SLACK 127

            more explicit links to structural linguistics (raised by Hall, 1980d: 327) and
            postmodernism;  foregrounding  the  status  of  the  ‘real’  rather  than  the
            problem  of  reduction  (as  does  Grossberg,  1992);  considering  the  role  of
            specific  articulations  such  as  those  of  gender,  race,  ethnicity,  neo-
            colonialism; foregrounding the politics of institutionalization; and finally,
            considering  the  influence  of  strategic  interventions  practised  among  the
            ranks of the practitioners of cultural studies.
              We can certainly expect that different conceptions of cultural studies and
            the development of cultural studies over time can and will be explained in
            part by changing configurations of articulation. I am particularly concerned
            that as cultural studies becomes more ‘domesticated’, that is, as it becomes
            a  more  institutionally  acceptable  academic  practice,  the  ‘problem’  of
            articulation  will  be  cast  more  as  a  theoretical,  methodological  and
            epistemological one than a political and strategic one. To some extent this
            is happening already. Given a dominant politics of despair and the political
            and economic realities of education, this is hardly a surprise; though it is
            discouraging. What I would hope, at least, is that by drawing attention to
            the  ways  in  which   the  re-articulation  of  articulation  entails
            changing  relations  among  theory,  method,  epistemology,  politics  and
            strategy, we might expect more of our detours through theory, not less.

                                       Author’s Note
              I  would  like  to  thank  Kuan-Hsing  Chen,  Lawrence  Grossberg,  David
            James Miller and Patricia Sotirin for helpful comments on earlier versions
            of  this  chapter  and  generous  guidance  in  working  out  some  of  the  issues
            dealt with here. Errors are, of course, my own.

                                      REFERENCES

            Brantlinger, P. (1990) Crusoe’s Footprints: Cultural Studies in Britain and America,
               New York and London: Routledge.
            Chen, Kuan-Hsing. (1994) Personal conversation, July.
            Grossberg, L. (1992) We Gotta Get Out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and
               Postmodern Culture, New York and London: Routledge.
            ———(1993)  ‘Cultural  studies  and/in  new  worlds’,  in  Critical  Studies  in  Mass
               Communication 10, 1–22.
            Hall,  S.  (1977)  ‘Rethinking  the  “base-and-superstructure”  metaphor’,  in  J.
               Bloomfield (ed.) Papers on Class, Hegemony and Party, London: Lawrence &
               Wishart, 43–72.
            ———(1980a) ‘Cultural studies: two paradigms’, in Media, Culture and Society 2
               (1), 57–72.
            ———(1980b)  ‘Encoding/decoding’,  in  S.Hall,  D.Hobson,  A.Lowe  and  P.  Willis
               (eds) Culture, Media, Language, London: Hutchinson, 128–40.
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144