Page 173 - Sustainability Communication Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoritical Foundations
P. 173

156                                           C. Herzig and S. Schaltegger


              Each of these deals with specific aspects of corporate sustainability and addresses
              different stakeholder groups.
            •  Stand-alone sustainability reports: In this reporting strategy, companies publish
              stand-alone sustainability reports that provide information about the company’s
              ecological, social and economic sustainability activities and performance, often
              following the format of earlier environmental reports and published in addition
              to financial reports. One of the earliest examples is the so-called ‘Triple P-Report’
              (People, Planet and Profits) of Shell, published in 1999, whose title already
              indicates its three-dimensional reporting character.
            •  Extended financial reports and integrated (business) reports: Selected environ-
              mental (and social) aspects of corporate performance have received more atten-
              tion in financial reports in recent years. Moreover, some companies integrate
              their environmental and social reporting into their business reports and publish
              only one integrated report.
              While reports addressing single aspects of corporate sustainability can be of
            certain use, stand-alone sustainability reports and fully integrated corporate reports
            have received particular attention, especially among large companies. In certain parts
            of the corporate sector the number of stand-alone sustainability reports nowadays
            exceeds those of environmental reports. Likewise with environmental statements,
            there is a trend towards more integrated reporting (BMU 2007). Important drivers for
            the  integration  of  environmental  and  social  information  in  financial  and  annual
            reports are the increasing interest of investors and analysts as well as regulatory
            requirements (Hesse 2010; UNEP et al. 2010). The conflation of corporate gover-
            nance,  financial  and  sustainability  reporting  has  recently  been  reinforced  by  the
            establishment of the International Integrated Reporting Committee (www.theiirc.org).
            Besides, stakeholder-specific sustainability reporting has been made easier through
            the technological developments of the Internet. The many advantages of the Internet
            have made it possible to publish short stand-alone reports that are linked to more in-
            depth information provided on the corporate websites. Whereas innovation in reporting
            formats is welcome, and can increase transparency and stakeholder involvement, the
            continuous experimentation and change of reporting contents and formats by compa-
            nies, sometimes from year to year, can hamper its comprehensibility and comparabi-
            lity. Further problems and challenges of sustainability reporting are described next.




            Specific Challenges in Sustainability Reporting

            Corporate sustainability reporting is characterized by several specific challenges:

            •   Agreement over the terms sustainable development or corporate sustainability is
              usually rather difficult as their meaning is context specific. In practice, the meaning
              of corporate sustainability is often not made explicit or constructed as the usual
              win-win rhetoric (Laine 2005). Moreover, the terminology applied to non- or
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178