Page 39 - Sustainability Communication Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoritical Foundations
P. 39

22                                                        K. Ott et al.



















            Fig. 2.1  Theory of funds (Source: von Egan-Krieger 2005)

            •   Pollutant emissions may not exceed the absorption capacity of environmental
              substances and ecosystems, and emissions of non-biodegradable pollutants are
              to  be  minimised,  whatever  the  extent  to  which  unoccupied  storage  capacity
              remains available.
              The rule of preservation is to be understood as a prohibition of degradation and
            the rule of investment as a mandate for improvement and creative planning.




            Conclusion

            At first glance, a strategy for defining sustainability that is oriented to the factual
            use of words in everyday societal language seems most viable for the task of com-
            municating about sustainability. However, as emphasised in the introduction to this
            chapter, this approach raises first and foremost the problem of unequal balances of
            power as well as the interest-influenced positioning that participants in communi-
            cation processes are exposed to. Therefore, common sense and ordinary language
            should be taken as a point of departure for communication strategies but not as
            their final outcome. Instead, the theoretical concept formation proposed here is
            open  to  discursive  intercourse  on  all  levels,  i.e.  arguments  can  be  examined,
            exchanged and improved.
              Processes of reciprocal understanding about sustainability objectives and strate-
            gies belong to the category of ‘epistemic-moral hybrids’ (Potthast 2005) because
            they constitute an interface between science, ethics, economics and politics. An
            ethical perspective can provide, among other things, practical knowledge to guide
            action and provide some orientation for defining objectives. This knowledge is deci-
            sive for participatory decision-making processes. The theory of strong sustainability
            offers a feasible alternative to the popular three-pillar model, which has few propo-
            nents in academic discourse (Paech 2006). Moreover, the theory of strong sustain-
            ability can serve as a critical benchmark for a number of national and international
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44