Page 299 - Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook
P. 299

The European Union: Nordic Countries and Germany Chapter j 14 273


                As of 2013, 26,000 people live in the district in the 11,000 apartments
             located there; construction completion is projected for 2017 with the ability to
             accommodate up to 35,000 residents. The district implemented a variety of
             transportation measures to reduce GHG emission, including a light rail system
             that accounts for one-third of all travel within the district (of which every
             residence is within 300 m of a stop), a free ferry service, a carpooling service
             utilizing electric vehicles (18% of households having signed up by 2010), and
             an extensive bike and walking path network. Based on a 2007 survey, the goal
             for 80% of transportation in the city to be based on public transportation was
             nearly reached, with 79% of all transportation being nonprivate (Jernberg
             et al., 2015). Hundred percent of the houses in the district are heated through a
             district heating network supplied by the nearby waste incinerating Ho ¨gdalen
             CHP plant and heat pumps using treated wastewater at the Hammarby thermal
             power plant. Most of the heat and electricity used comes from the burning of
             the waste generated in the district at the CHP plant. Furthermore, the sludge
             from the district’s wastewater treatment process is converted into enough
             biogas to supply the district with its gas demand. Although there were no green
             building goals, the average energy usage for the districts buildings is
                      2
             118 kWh/m , lower than Stockholm’s average. One building in particular that
             garners attention is the GlashusEtt, which serves as an environmental infor-
             mation center displaying sustainable infrastructure and building techniques
             resulting in an energy consumption 50% less than similar glass buildings. Such
             features include smart monitoring system, PV cells, hydrogen fuel cell, and
             heat pumps (Jernberg et al., 2015)(Fig. 14.12).
                The district has been viewed as a success, yet criticism has been voiced that
             most of the waste generated comes from outside the district, for example, food
             waste comes from food throughout the world, counterintuitive to the “close the
             loop” idea. Also noted is that despite as originally envisioned, PV, solar col-
             lectors, and wind turbines on a large scale were never developed, with only a
             few houses having solar collectors or solar PV cells (Iveroth et al., 2013).




















                             FIGURE 14.12 Glasshuset (Stockholm Stad).
   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304