Page 47 - The Apple Experience
P. 47

Jobs’s top executives understood that they had to treat Jobs with respect
                    but that they were also expected to push back on his ideas and argue their

                    points. “I realized very early that if you didn’t voice your opinion, he would

                    mow you down,”  Tim Cook told Isaacson when he was still Apple’s chief
                                       2
                    operating officer. “He [Jobs] takes  contrary positions to create more

                    discussion, because it may lead to a better result. So if you don’t feel

                    comfortable disagreeing, then you’ll never survive.”

                        Although Jobs could be sharp in his criticism, his behavior was oddly
                    inspiring because in many cases with his team, he wasn’t being mean to be

                    mean. He was challenging them to push beyond their self-perceived limits.

                    Jobs believed that by expecting people to do great things, they would do great

                    things. If a person was calm and confident and Jobs could see that the person

                    was passionately devoted to the user experience, he would respect that team

                    member and his or her opinions.

                        In one YouTube video that recently surfaced, Jobs is seen holding an
                    internal meeting with employees at NeXT, the computer company he built

                    after leaving Apple in 1985.  He talked about the importance of “reiterating”
                                                   3
                    the vision, which he did a lot. Again, we see why all inspiring

                    communications begin with the passionate pursuit of a bold, intoxicating

                    vision. During the meeting, one employee took Jobs to task for a punishing

                    production schedule. The meeting took place in 1986, and Jobs was

                    concerned that a failure to deliver the product in the spring of 1987, eighteen

                    months away, could lead to the company’s failure. The employee argued that

                    compromising the quality of the product to meet a subjective deadline didn’t
                    make sense. The woman was strong, forceful, articulate, and knowledgeable.

                    Jobs looked at her, nodded, and had a comeback. The conversation grew

                    heated but gave others the confidence to voice their opinions as well. By the
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52