Page 133 - The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method
P. 133

116    CONTACT DETECTION

              The results obtained show that the total detection time is not dependent on packing
            density, which changes from

                                         1                 1
                                   1to      i.e. from 1 to                       (3.68)
                                        200 2           40,000

              Example IV consists of N = 10,000 circular discrete elements of diameter D spaced
            at distance 2D in the y-direction and at distance D and S in the x-direction (Figure 3.52).
            For each given value of S, contact detection is performed 10 times, and the total CPU
            time for all 10 detections of all contacts is recorded using profiled debugging version of
            the code. The results are shown in Figure 3.53.
              The numerical results shown above clearly demonstrate that the total detection time is
            constant for a large range of packing densities. This is the case for all packs considered,
            as theoretically predicted.
              In summary:

            • Memory requirements of the Munjiza-NBS algorithm are insignificant, and do not
              change significantly with considerable changes in packing density.

            • Total detection time for the Munjiza-NBS algorithm does not depend upon packing
              density, a result confirmed by both theoretical investigations and numerical experiments.
            • The relationship between the total detection time and the total number of discrete
              elements comprising the problem is linear. This result is confirmed by both theoretical
              investigations and numerical experiments.




                                              Packing  "D"



                              2D




                              2D



                              2D





                                    D      S             S      D



            Figure 3.52  Example IV, packing D (A. Munjiza and K.R.F. Andrews, International Journal for
            Numerical Methods in Engineering, 43/1). (Reproduced by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Ltd).
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138