Page 178 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 178

164               The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation


            controls came back in the third quarter of the century along with higher taxes. Much of the
            third period also had high tax rates before being dramatically reduced near period end. In the
            last period of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century, tax law,
            SEC requirements, and accounting standards all focused on one or more components of
            the pay package.

            SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

            The stakeholders significantly affect the design of pay programs because they have different,
            sometimes conflicting, objectives. For example, employees look for employment as well as
            good pay, shareholders want a good return on their investment, the rulemakers prescribe
            regulations to be followed, suppliers look for purchases of their goods and services, customers
            look for quality-priced products/services when needed, and executives look to be paid hand-
            somely for achieving all of the above to the extent possible.
               Table 4-40 recaps and summarizes the previously described stakeholder interest in execu-
            tive pay by time period. One would expect the interest of customers, employees, shareholders,
            and suppliers to be linked inversely to how well they are faring. The rulemakers’ interest
            seems to be continually increasing, making it more and more difficult to design pay programs
            that do not cause serious problems with one or more rulemaking authorities. And, of course,
            executive interest is high, especially since risk (contractual employment) seems not to decrease
            but only increase.


                           1900–1925   1926–1950   1951–1975   1976–2000    2001–Present
            Executive         High      Moderate      High        High          High

            Employees         Low         Low       Moderate      High          High

            Shareholders      Low         Low       Moderate      High          High
            Customers         Low         Low         Low         Low         Moderate
            Suppliers         Low         Low         Low         Low         Moderate

            Rulemakers        Low       Moderate    Moderate      High          High
            Table 4-40. Stakeholders’ historic interest in executive pay

               Some suppliers and companies in the threshold stage find it mutually advantageous for
            the company to “pay” in the form of stock options. More than one celebrity took a large stock
            option in such a company instead of a significant fee to promote the company product. Fee
            consultants have done the same.
               Companies get themselves in difficulty because they do not focus on all of their stake-
            holders or meet the requirements of the rulemakers. Really successful companies nurture their
            relationships with their shareholders, their community, their suppliers, and their employees.
            Similarly, the executive has a number of stakeholders: family, friends, community, work
            associates, and employer. Like the employer, the executive must keep these relationships
            in balance.
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183